Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Chemical Inactivation of the E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Cereblon by Pomalidomide-based Homo-PROTACs
Published on: May 15, 2019
Outcomes of Calcium-Channel Blocker Use in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Propensity-Matched Study From the Global
Sarah Eidbo1, John H Malin1, Maxim Barnett1
1Internal Medicine, Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA.
Introduction:
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell hyperproliferative disorder resulting in a classic presentation including anemia, renal dysfunction, bone pain, and hypercalcemia. Many patients with MM also develop unrelated comorbid conditions, such as hypertension or congestive heart failure, that warrant the prescription of calcium-channel blockers (CCBs). Little is known about how MM-associated hypercalcemia could be impacted by CCB use. This study aimed to determine how CCBs could impact outcomes in patients with MM.
Methods:
Utilizing TriNetX's US Collaborative Network and ICD-10 codes, we identified adult patients with MM prescribed CCBs and compared them to patients with MM not prescribed CCBs. Cohorts were propensity-matched according to age, sex, race, and comorbidities. We followed these cohorts for five years to assess rates of acute kidney injury (AKI), dialysis initiation (hemodialysis (HD)), seizures, atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL), ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT), ICU admission, and all-cause mortality.
Results:
Cohorts were propensity-matched with each CCB cohort compared with a group that was not prescribed any CCB. Compared to any CCBs, the MM no CCB cohort had lower rates of AKI (hazard ratio (HR) 0.937, 95% CI 0.911 - 0.964, p<0.0001), HD (HR 0.587, 95% CI 0.551 - 0.625, p<0.0001), seizures (HR 0.823, 95% CI 0.755 - 0.898, p=0.0002), AF/AFL (HR 0.942, 95% CI 0.905 - 0.98, p<0.0001), and VF/VT (HR 0.981, 95% CI 0.901 - 1.076, p<0.0001). The MM no CCB cohort had higher rates of mortality (HR 1.031, 95% CI 1.004 - 1.059, p<0.0001). The MM no amlodipine cohort had lower rates of AKI (HR 1.011, 95% CI 0.98 - 1.044, p<0.0001), HD (HR 0.749, 95% CI 0.698 - 0.803, p<0.0001), seizures (HR 1.034, 95% CI 0.939 - 1.139, p<0.0001), and ICU admission (HR 0.159, 95% CI 0.118 - 0.214, p=0.0367) compared to the amlodipine cohort. The MM no amlodipine cohort had increased risk of AF/AFL (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.371 - 1.513, p<0.0001), VF/VT (HR 1.464, 95% CI 1.322 - 1.62, p<0.0001), and mortality (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.058 - 1.123, p<0.0001). The MM no nicardipine cohort had reduced risk of mortality (HR 0.754, 95% CI 0.633 - 0.899, p=0.0002) compared to the nicardipine cohort. The MM no nifedipine cohort had less risk of HD (HR 0.507, 95% CI 0.402 - 0.639, p=0.0057) and mortality (HR 0.935, 95% CI 0.839 - 1.043, p=0.0395) compared to the nifedipine cohort. The MM no nifedipine cohort had a higher risk of AF/AFL (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.306 - 1.935, p=0.0003) and VF/VT (HR 1.927, 95% CI 1.326 - 2.799, p=0.0012). The MM no diltiazem cohort had lower rates of HD (HR 0.941, 95% CI 0.79 - 1.121, p=0.0256), AF/AFL (HR 0.322, 95% CI 0.293 - 0.353, p<0.0001), and mortality (HR 0.775, 95% CI 0.728 - 0.825, p=0.0006) than the diltiazem cohort. The MM no diltiazem cohort demonstrated higher rates of AKI (HR 1.086, 95% CI 1.005-1.174, p=0.0003). The MM no verapamil cohort had a reduced risk of AF/AFL (HR 0.949, 95% CI 0.798-1.129, p=0.0011) compared to the verapamil cohort. The MM no verapamil cohort had a higher risk of AKI (HR 1.369, 95% CI 1.203 - 1.557, p=0.0001) and HD (HR 1.329, 95% CI 0.985 - 1.795, p=0.0392).
Conclusions:
Even after risk stratification and propensity-score matching, there appear to be differences in outcomes between patients with MM on various CCBs. The hypercalcemia in MM may be perpetuated by CCBs, leading to poor outcomes in certain patients. These differences warrant further exploration.
More Related Videos
07:24Repression of Multiple Myeloma Cell Growth In Vivo by Single-wall Carbon Nanotube SWCNT-delivered MALAT1 Antisense Oligos
Published on: December 13, 2018
09:41An Organotypic High Throughput System for Characterization of Drug Sensitivity of Primary Multiple Myeloma Cells
Published on: July 15, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Antihypertensive Drugs: Action of Calcium Channel Blockers
Antiepileptic Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers
Calcium channel blockers exert their antiepileptic effects by targeting T-type calcium channels, which are integral to transmitting nerve signals in the central nervous system. These channels allow the passage of calcium ions, which are vital for neuronal communication. By inhibiting T-type calcium channels, calcium channel blockers effectively reduce the release of neurotransmitters and...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers
TKIs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), are particularly effective in tackling the growth and mitogenic factors that become upregulated in PAH patients. These factors contribute to the...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT