Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Healthy participant engagement in early clinical trials: results from the European EUFEMED survey
J Klein1, T van Iersel2, D de Vries3
1SGS, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Introduction:
While numerous healthy volunteers contribute to clinical trials on a yearly basis, the aspect of including these participants in the drug development process, like the patient-centric approaches, are not well known. To gain broader insights in the aspect of healthy participant engagement, preferences, and motivation, we performed a European wide survey. Additionally, a literature search on the topic of healthy participant engagement was performed.
Methods:
An online questionnaire containing 61 questions on demographics, motivation, informed consent, engagement, transparency, and preferences was created, combining five-point Likert and open text field answers. The questionnaire was translated in several European languages and shared among early phase clinical trial units within Europe. Additionally, a literature search was performed on healthy participant engagement.
Results:
A total of 4,349 completed questionnaires were eligible for analysis. Countries with adequate number of responses were Belgium, France, Netherlands, Germany, Hungary and United Kingdom. Altruistic motivation was the primary reason for participation. The Informed Consent Form (ICF) paragraphs on risk, schedule of assessments and restriction was better read than the financial aspects, ethics and data protection, with variations between gender, age, experience and country. Only 71.2% of the responders finds an ICF written in correct lay language and 44.6% is willing to assist in ICF review on adequate lay language. In the literature search, no articles described healthy participant engagement.
Discussion:
The benefit of including patients in the drug development process has been proven in multiple publications and is a movement that is being advocated more frequently. Healthy participant engagement is not known yet, while similar benefits can be suggested. As altruistic reasons are the main motivation for participation, engaging participant in the clinical trials might enhance their motivation. Together with all stakeholders, description of methods for healthy participant engagement should be initiated to increase willingness to contribute to clinical trials.
More Related Videos
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Preclinical Development: Overview
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...