Related Concept Videos
Components of Language
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Language
Corballis and Suddendorf (2007) and Tomasello and Rakoczy (2003) highlight the role of language in...
Language and Cognition
Sign Test for Nominal Data
For example, consider a...
Introduction to the Sign Test
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Avoiding unintended consequences: science of reading policies may harm deaf children.
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm
Published on: May 15, 2019
Typological Comparisons and Considerations: Phonological and Morphological Evidence from Sign Language Creation.
Diane Brentari1, Rabia Ergin2, Ann Senghas3
1Department of Linguistics, and the co-director of the Center for Gesture, Sign, and Language at the University of Chicago.
This study compares Central Taurus Sign Language and Nicaraguan Sign Language, revealing significant variation influenced by community factors. Nicaraguan Sign Language shows more diversity, highlighting the evolution from homesigns to a structured language.
More Related Videos
05:38Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
Published on: June 29, 2021
09:09Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
Area of Science:
- Linguistics
- Sign Language Studies
- Sociolinguistics
Background:
- Comparing emerging sign languages provides insights into language evolution.
- Central Taurus Sign Language (CTSL) and Nicaraguan Sign Language (LSN) are approximately 50 years old.
- Understanding variation drivers in sign languages is crucial for linguistic typology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare phonological and information packaging aspects of CTSL and LSN.
- To analyze variation patterns across different signer cohorts within each language.
- To identify sociodemographic factors influencing sign language emergence and development.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of handshape inventories for phonological complexity.
- Examination of complex predicates focusing on agency and number.
- Comparative analysis of data from three CTSL and three LSN signer groups.
Main Results:
- Significant variation observed in both phonology and information packaging across languages and cohorts.
- Nicaraguan Sign Language (LSN) exhibited greater variation than Central Taurus Sign Language (CTSL).
- LSN variation illustrates a developmental trajectory from homesigns to a formalized language.
Conclusions:
- Community size, signer contact, and sociocultural factors shape sign language variation.
- Existing models for describing sign language communities require refinement.
- Further comparative research on new sign languages is essential for understanding language evolution.