Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2026

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
Published on: May 26, 2020
Between-session reliability and minimal detectable difference of peak tibial acceleration during running on an indoor
Zoe Y S Chan1, Hannah Dimmick2, Reed Ferber1
1Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Abstract:
Peak tibial acceleration (PTA) is commonly used to assess impact loading during running, but the number of strides required for reliable between-session measurement in overground conditions, as well as the minimal detectable difference (MDD), remains unclear. This study evaluated the one-week and three-week reliability of axial and resultant PTA during overground running and determined the minimum number of strides needed for good and excellent reliability. Eleven recreational runners completed three sessions on a 200-m indoor oval track while wearing a tibial-mounted accelerometer. PTA was analysed across different stride intervals, and test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results showed moderate-to-good reliability for axial PTA (ICC = 0.71-0.80 at 1 week, 0.67-0.84 at 3 weeks) and moderate-to-excellent reliability for resultant PTA (ICC = 0.81-0.94 at 1 week, 0.78-0.91 at 3 weeks). Based on our results, we recommend averaging at least 40 strides to achieve good reliability for axial PTA (MDD = 2.93 g), and at least 100 strides to achieve excellent reliability of resultant PTA (MDD = 2.72 g). These findings support the reliability of PTA when evaluating longer-term interventions, such as gait retraining, but researchers should consider stride variability and track curvature when interpreting results.
Related Concept Videos
Average Acceleration
Dynamics Of Circular Motion: Applications
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

