Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

A Pediatric Concussion Model in Mice: Closed Head Injury with Long-Term Disorders (CHILD)
Published on: February 7, 2025
Characteristics Among a Pediatric Cohort Arriving Via EMS Following Nonaccidental and Accidental Trauma
Karen Piper1, Giovanni Gabriele2, Matthew Wilkinson1,3
1Dell Children's Trauma and Injury Research Center.
Insights
Injured children arriving by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) at a trauma center were analyzed. A significant percentage were victims of nonaccidental trauma (NAT), presenting with younger age and higher care needs.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Trauma Care
- Child Abuse Forensics
- Emergency Medical Services Research
Background:
- Nonaccidental trauma (NAT) is a critical concern in pediatric emergency medicine.
- Understanding the characteristics of children with NAT presenting to trauma centers is vital for early identification and intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize injured children arriving at a Pediatric Level I Trauma Center via Emergency Medical Services (EMS).
- To identify predictive factors for children injured due to nonaccidental trauma (NAT).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of children aged 5 years and younger arriving via EMS (January 2016-December 2018).
- NAT determination by a Multidisciplinary Child Protection Team.
- Comparison of prehospital and hospital factors between NAT and accidental trauma (AT) groups, including subanalysis of head injuries.
Main Results:
- The study included 352 children; 8.5% sustained NAT.
- Children with NAT were younger, required higher levels of care (admission), and had longer EMS scene times (>15 minutes, aOR 3.46) compared to AT.
- Among 121 children with head injuries, 9% were NAT, showing similar patterns of younger age and longer EMS scene times.
Conclusions:
- A notable proportion of injured children arriving via EMS were victims of NAT.
- NAT-injured children were younger and required higher care levels than AT.
- Extended EMS scene times in NAT cases warrant further investigation.
Objectives:
To describe the characteristics of injured children arriving at a Pediatric Level I Trauma Center via Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and determine predictive characteristics for children injured due to nonaccidental trauma (NAT).
Methods:
A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed for children 5 years of age and younger arriving via EMS from January 2016 through December 2018. NAT finding was made by a Multidisciplinary Child Protection Team of child abuse clinicians, representatives from Child Protective Services, law enforcement, and District Attorney's offices. The rate of NAT was determined, and prehospital (ie, demographics) and hospital (ie, highest level of care) factor differences were explored between children with injuries sustained from NAT versus accidental trauma (AT). Additional subanalyses examined those among the cohort with head injuries.
Results:
The sample included 352 children; 8.5% were found with injuries sustained from NAT. These children were younger, needed higher levels of care (ie, admission) and more likely to have EMS scene times >15 minutes (aOR 3.46) compared with those with AT. Among the population with head injuries (n=121), 9% were sustained from NAT. Like the full cohort, children were younger and more likely to have EMS scene times >15 minutes.
Conclusions:
In our study, a substantial proportion of injured children arriving at the hospital via EMS were victims of NAT. These children were younger and had injuries warranting higher levels of care than those with AT. Significantly higher EMS scene times among the NAT group warrant more exploration.
More Related Videos
11:27A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
09:49Assessing Changes in Synaptic Plasticity Using an Awake Closed-Head Injury Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: January 20, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History: