Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Quantitative Immunohistochemistry of the Cellular Microenvironment in Patient Glioblastoma Resections
Published on: July 31, 2017
Comparison of automated and manual approaches for microglial quantification and classification: A focus on the HALO
Laura M Carr1, Bianca Guglietti1, Ing Chee Wee1
1School of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Abstract:
Phenotypic changes in microglia have been linked to multiple neurological conditions, such as dementia, Parkinson's disease, stroke and traumatic brain injury. Consistent identification and classification of microglia is essential in understanding potential links with neurological diseases. Currently, there are several ways by which the microglial population and morphology are assessed, including manually or using open-source image analysis platforms, such as ImageJ. A microglial classification module for the HALO digital pathology platform has been developed for this purpose but has not yet been validated within the literature. The current study therefore conducted a comparison of the performance of this HALO module to manual microglial analysis and to automated analysis via ImageJ using both human and rat brain tissue. In 5 μm thick human tissue, total and activated microglia/mm2 counted by HALO showed strong positive correlations with both manual and ImageJ counts. HALO did not differ from the other methods for total microglia counts; however, Halo did differ from both manual and ImageJ methods in the number of activated microglia detected within the substantia nigra. In 20 μm rat tissue, total counts derived from HALO showed moderate positive correlations with both manual and ImageJ counting; however, activated counts on Halo were not positively correlated with any method. To our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically compare the Halo module to other common methods of microglia analysis. When applied to 5 μm tissue, the Halo module is comparable to manual counting and to automated analysis on ImageJ. However, when analyzing thicker tissue, Halo struggles to perform in line with these other methods, particularly for counts of activated microglia, likely due to increased cell density and the morphological complexity of microglia. These results highlight the importance of carefully tailoring image analysis parameters on automated counting methods to suit the needs of the tissue.
Insights
The HALO digital pathology platform
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience and Pathology
- Computational Biology and Image Analysis
Background:
- Microglia, immune cells of the central nervous system, undergo phenotypic changes linked to neurological disorders.
- Accurate identification and classification of microglia are crucial for understanding their role in diseases like dementia and Parkinson's.
- Current methods for microglial analysis include manual counting and open-source platforms like ImageJ.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate a new microglial classification module for the HALO digital pathology platform.
- To compare the HALO module's performance against manual analysis and ImageJ.
- To assess the accuracy of HALO in analyzing both human and rat brain tissue.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of microglial counting using the HALO module, manual counting, and ImageJ.
- Utilized both 5 μm thick human brain tissue and 20 μm thick rat brain tissue.
- Quantified total and activated microglia per square millimeter.
Main Results:
- HALO showed strong positive correlations with manual and ImageJ for total and activated microglia in 5 μm human tissue.
- Discrepancies were observed in activated microglia counts within the substantia nigra between HALO, manual, and ImageJ methods.
- In 20 μm rat tissue, HALO's total microglia counts moderately correlated, but activated counts showed no positive correlation with other methods.
Conclusions:
- The HALO module is comparable to manual and ImageJ for analyzing thinner (5 μm) tissue sections.
- HALO's performance, particularly for activated microglia, is less reliable in thicker (20 μm) tissue due to cell density and morphological complexity.
- Optimizing image analysis parameters is essential for automated methods, especially with complex tissue samples.

