Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

160
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
160
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

282
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
282
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

6.5K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
6.5K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

7.8K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
7.8K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.2K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.2K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

4.5K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
4.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Eyewitness suspect identification: six claims regarding the state of the science.

Memory (Hove, England)·2025
Same author

Eyewitness Lineup Identity (ELI) database: Crime videos and mugshots for eyewitness identification research.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Correction: Distress reactions and susceptibility to misinformation for an analogue trauma event.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2024
Same author

Distress reactions and susceptibility to misinformation for an analogue trauma event.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2024
Same author

Estimation of eyewitness error rates in fair and biased lineups.

Law and human behavior·2023
Same author

Associations between the misinformation effect, trauma exposure and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression.

Memory (Hove, England)·2022
Same journal

Episodic and semantic memory contributions to imagination and creativity.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

What is the relationship between stress and prospective memory in everyday environments?

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Revisiting the confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: a metacognitive perspective.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Beliefs about child witnesses: a survey of Danish legal professionals, social workers and psychologists.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Potto-biographical memory ≈ autobiographical memory: on the retrieval and organisation of fictional- and personal-event memories.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Conceptual and perceptual chunking of real-world objects in visual working memory.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.3K

Error rates for high confidence eyewitness identifications.

Ryan J Fitzgerald1, Ira E Hyman2, Kimberley A Wade3

  • 1Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.

Memory (Hove, England)
|August 19, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Eyewitness identification errors are common, even with high confidence. A meta-analysis found 1 in 8 high-confidence identifications were mistaken, highlighting the unreliability of eyewitness testimony in criminal investigations.

Keywords:
Police lineupconfidencefield studymeta-analysissuspect bias

More Related Videos

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.2K
Spotting Cheetahs: Identifying Individuals by Their Footprints
09:47

Spotting Cheetahs: Identifying Individuals by Their Footprints

Published on: May 1, 2016

14.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.3K
Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.2K
Spotting Cheetahs: Identifying Individuals by Their Footprints
09:47

Spotting Cheetahs: Identifying Individuals by Their Footprints

Published on: May 1, 2016

14.9K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Forensic Science
  • Criminal Justice

Background:

  • Eyewitness identification is a critical component of criminal investigations.
  • High confidence in an initial identification does not guarantee accuracy.
  • Existing wrongful conviction data often lacks initial eyewitness confidence measures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To meta-analyze field data on eyewitness identification accuracy.
  • To assess the error rate of high-confidence eyewitness identifications.
  • To explore factors contributing to eyewitness misidentification.

Main Methods:

  • Meta-analysis of data from actual criminal investigations.
  • Inclusion of studies using blind lineup administrators.
  • Review of laboratory studies examining high-confidence identification error rates under varying bias conditions.

Main Results:

  • 12.5% (1 in 8) of high-confidence identifications in field studies were errors.
  • Laboratory studies show high-confidence error rates can range from 0% to 40%.
  • Suspect bias, including appearance-based suspicion, social media contamination, and misplaced prior familiarity, influences error rates.

Conclusions:

  • Eyewitness identification of strangers is prone to error, irrespective of initial confidence.
  • Field data with blind administrators provide crucial insights into real-world identification reliability.
  • Understanding and mitigating suspect bias is essential to improve eyewitness identification accuracy.