Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anti-scatter grid performance in digital mammography and contrast-enhanced mammography: a Monte Carlo study.

Physics in medicine and biology·2025
Same author

Assessing the Impact of Visualizations of Quantitative and Qualitative Risk Information on the Comprehension of Hypothetical Risk-Based Breast Cancer Screening Results.

Health communication·2025
Same author

Why AI evaluation should reflect its clinical role in mammography.

European radiology·2025
Same author

Influence of AI Decision Support on Radiologists' Performance and Visual Search in Screening Mammography.

Radiology·2025
Same author

An Exploration of Discrepant Recalls Between AI and Human Readers of Malignant Lesions in Digital Mammography Screening.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

More than density: validating a mammographic masking prediction model in Dutch breast cancer screening.

European radiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence
08:05

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence

Published on: June 10, 2025

665

AI Should Read Mammograms Only When Confident: A Hybrid Breast Cancer Screening Reading Strategy.

Sarah D Verboom1, Jaap Kroes2, Santiago Pires2

  • 1Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Medical Imaging, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, the Netherlands.

Radiology
|August 19, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) with uncertainty quantification in mammography screening can significantly reduce radiologist workload. This AI approach maintains cancer detection and recall rates, improving efficiency in breast cancer screening.

More Related Videos

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.0K
Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

236

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence
08:05

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence

Published on: June 10, 2025

665
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.0K
Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

236

Area of Science:

  • Radiology and Medical Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Breast Cancer Screening

Background:

  • Quantifying uncertainty in AI-based mammogram interpretations is crucial for integrating AI into screening programs.
  • Current AI models require evaluation for their impact on radiologist workload and diagnostic performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the potential reduction in radiologist workload during mammographic screening.
  • To evaluate the performance of an AI model incorporating uncertainty quantification in mammography interpretation.
  • To determine if AI integration maintains or improves cancer detection and recall rates.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an AI model outputting probability of malignancy (PoM) and uncertainty.
  • Implemented a hybrid reading approach: AI handles confident predictions, radiologists review uncertain cases.
  • Retrospectively optimized and tested the approach on a large dataset (41,469 examinations) using various uncertainty metrics.

Main Results:

  • The best uncertainty metric (entropy of mean PoM) allowed AI to read 61.9% of examinations.
  • Hybrid reading achieved recall (23.6‰) and cancer detection rates (6.6‰) similar to standard double reading.
  • AI model's AUC was significantly lower for uncertain (0.87) versus certain (0.96) predictions (P=.02).

Conclusions:

  • AI mammography interpretation with uncertainty quantification can substantially decrease radiologist workload.
  • This approach maintains comparable cancer detection and recall rates to traditional double reading.
  • Uncertainty quantification enables effective AI integration, optimizing screening efficiency.