Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
Withdrawal of heart failure therapy after atrial fibrillation rhythm control with ejection fraction normalization:
Louise Segan1,2,3,4,5, Peter M Kistler1,2,3,4,5,6, Shane Nanayakkara1,2,4,5
1Department of Cardiometabolics, The Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, 99 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Insights
Discontinuing heart failure (HF) therapy after restoring normal heart function in atrial fibrillation-mediated cardiomyopathy (AFCM) is safe for most patients. Rhythm control and normal ejection fraction (LVEF) allow for successful HF medication withdrawal.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation-mediated cardiomyopathy (AFCM) causes reversible left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
- Current guidelines recommend indefinite heart failure (HF) pharmacotherapy post-normalization of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
- The necessity of continued HF therapy for maintaining LVEF after AF rhythm control is uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of staged withdrawal of HF therapy after AF rhythm control and LVEF normalization in AFCM.
- To determine if HF pharmacotherapy is necessary to maintain normal LVEF in these patients.
Main Methods:
- A multi-center, randomized trial involving 60 patients with AFCM.
- Participants underwent AF rhythm control and achieved LVEF normalization before randomization.
- Randomization was 1:1 to early (Group A) or delayed (Group B) withdrawal of HF therapy, with a crossover design.
Main Results:
- LVEF was maintained at ≥50% at 6 months in 90% of patients withdrawing HF therapy (Group A) versus 100% continuing therapy (Group B).
- Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) LVEF and other clinical parameters were similar between groups post-randomization and throughout follow-up.
- No significant decline in LVEF or worsening of other outcomes was observed after HF therapy withdrawal.
Conclusions:
- Withdrawal of HF therapy following AF rhythm control and LVEF recovery in AFCM is not associated with LVEF decline in the majority of patients.
- This suggests that HF pharmacotherapy may be safely discontinued in select AFCM patients after successful rhythm control and LVEF normalization.
Background And Aims:
Atrial fibrillation-mediated cardiomyopathy (AFCM) represents an important reversible cause of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Current clinical practice is indefinite heart failure (HF) pharmacotherapy despite left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) normalization. However, whether this is necessary to maintain normal LVEF, in addition to rhythm control, is uncertain.
Methods:
This multi-centre, randomized trial conducted between 2021 and 2024 examined the impact of staged withdrawal of HF therapy following AF rhythm control and LVEF normalization in AFCM. Participants were randomized (1:1) to early withdrawal (Group A) or continued therapy for 6 months followed by delayed withdrawal (Group B), in a crossover design. The primary endpoint was the randomized comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) LVEF maintenance ≥50% at 6 months, during which time Group A had withdrawn therapy and Group B remained on treatment. Secondary outcomes included cardiac remodelling, functional status, biomarkers, quality of life, and arrhythmia recurrence on vs off HF therapy. The total follow-up duration was 12 months.
Results:
Between July 2021 and May 2024, 60 patients were enrolled (age 60 [55-65] years, previous persistent AF <1 year and maintaining sinus rhythm for minimum 6 months following AF rhythm control [catheter ablation in 97%]). All participants completed treatment withdrawal and 12-month follow-up. In the initial randomized comparison, LVEF was maintained ≥50% at 6 months in 90% of participants undergoing HF therapy withdrawal (Group A), compared with 100% who continued medical therapy (Group B) (odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-2.82, P = .47). CMR LVEF was similar between randomization groups at the end of the randomization phase (Group A: LVEF 58% [95% CI 54-60] vs Group B: LVEF 59% [95% CI 55-64], P = .236) and across study time points (mixed effects P = .37). Transthoracic echocardiography characteristics, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, functional status, quality of life and AF burden were similar on vs off HF therapy in the overall population.
Conclusions:
Withdrawal of HF therapy following AF rhythm control for prior AFCM and recovered LVEF was not associated with a decline in LVEF for most patients in the following 6 months.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers

