Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
A Mixed Methods Assessment of the Effect of Organizational Characteristics on Intervention Scale-Up Success in 42 HIV
Sophia M Bartels1, Hong Linh T Dang2, Jane S Chen3
1Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Rationale:
Organizational characteristics, including structures, culture, and climate, are important determinants of intervention scale-up success. Little is known about which characteristics are most important for HIV intervention scale-up success in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), and how they influence implementation in these contexts.
Aims And Objectives:
We sought to examine the relationship between organizational characteristics and scale-up success within an implementation trial testing strategies to scale up Systems Navigation and Psychosocial Counselling (SNaP) for people who inject drugs (PWID) with HIV in Vietnam.
Methods:
This study was conducted in 42 HIV testing clinics in Vietnam. Informed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment Framework, we assessed the association between five organizational characteristics and SNaP scale-up success: (1) implementation leadership; (2) staff workload; (3) percent PWID; (4) implementation climate; and (5) organizational readiness. We conducted a mixed methods study including surveys at baseline and endline with clinic staff and PWID participants in all clinics and interviews with clinic staff (n = 48) in six high and six low-performing clinics. To develop a context-driven scale-up success index for our outcome measure, we undertook a modified Delphi process with 14 experts in HIV, PWID, and implementation science. We assessed the relationship between our organizational characteristics and scale-up success using thematic and multiple linear regression analyses and explored the convergence of results.
Results And Conclusion:
Greater implementation leadership (ß = 12.20, p = 0.004), high staff workload (ß = 4.71, p = 0.008), and lower implementation climate scores (ß = -6.23, p = 0.046) were significantly associated with scale-up success. Qualitatively, participants described the importance of implementation leadership, particularly during COVID-19, and, to a lesser extent, implementation climate and organizational readiness for scale-up success. Some also described how more time spent on SNaP delivery improved fidelity but exacerbated workload. These findings demonstrate that prioritizing implementation leadership-focused strategies for the scale-up of HIV interventions like SNaP could improve implementation outcomes.
More Related Videos
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
19:57An Affordable HIV-1 Drug Resistance Monitoring Method for Resource Limited Settings
Published on: March 30, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Cochran's Q Test