Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025
Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Process & Outcome Evaluation of a Rural Health Network to Assess Effectiveness
Sarah Mollman1, Kelly Boyd2, Charlene Berke2
1College of Nursing, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA.
Background:
Rural residents face many health disparities and challenges. Rural health networks form to address the specific needs of a community by bringing together multiple individuals and organisations; however, there is limited literature on the evaluation of these networks.
Objective:
To evaluate a network's effectiveness in three areas: (1) capacity to achieve change in palliative care education, (2) key results of collaborative efforts, and (3) extent to which grant activities were implemented.
Methods:
Grant required evaluation measures were used to answer area one and three: key sector representation, network organisational assessment, external environmental scan, and SWOT analysis. To answer area two, knowledge and commitment to change were evaluated after a palliative care symposium.
Results:
The network was proficient or excelling in all 15 areas of a Network Organisational Assessment and represented all 38 key sectors representing the focus of network (palliative care). Through repeated external environment scans and analysis of the strategic plan, the network continually evaluated the landscape in which it operated enabling the network to adapt and capitalise on opportunities. The outcome evaluation of the network's symposium revealed that most participants reported improvement in their ability to impact patient outcomes (59%), overall confidence and performance (65%), and knowledge of palliative care (78%). Nearly all participants reported better communication and collaboration with a multidisciplinary team (96% and 97% respectively) and intent to apply what they learned in their team (97%). Practice changes included commitment to improving their patient education, communication, and teamwork.
Conclusion:
The network's evaluation demonstrated its effectiveness in three areas. This article adds to the limited literature on network evaluation by presenting practical tools to grow, engage, and evaluate a network so other rural health networks can replicate these evaluations to assess their effectiveness.
Related Concept Videos
01:15Nursing Evaluation
01:08Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
01:30Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
01:26Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
01:20Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
01:11Secondary Healthcare System