Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2025
Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
Assessing the Diagnostic Value of MRI T1rho Mapping in Predicting Molecular Prognostic Biomarkers and Subtypes of
Lanqing Yang1, Yi Zeng1, Sixian Hu1
1Radiology Department of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Background:
Prognostic factors and molecular subtypes are important in treatment planning and predicting response to therapy in breast cancer, and the exploration of noninvasive imaging methods to characterize breast cancer has been ongoing.
Purpose:
To evaluate the use of T1rho mapping in predicting the status of prognostic biomarkers and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
Study Type:
Prospective.
Subjects:
Ninety One women with breast tumors.
Field Strength/Sequence:
3T, T1 rho prepared balanced turbo field echo sequence.
Assessment:
Mean T1rho values were compared between positive and negative status of prognostic biomarkers [estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and proliferation index (Ki-67)] and molecular subtypes.
Statistical Tests:
Independent t test, one-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Results:
Mean T1rho values were significantly higher in ER-negative compared to ER-positive tumors (70 ± 6.769 vs. 55 ± 10.791 ms), in PR-negative compared to PR-positive tumors (68.48 ± 9.563 vs. 60.46 ± 10.099 ms), and in high Ki-67 proliferation compared to low Ki-67 proliferation tumors (66.59 ± 8.994 vs. 57.77 ± 11.501 ms). Significant negative correlations were observed between ER and PR statuses and T1rho values (r s = 0.416 and 0.392, respectively). The Ki-67 status was significantly positively correlated with T1rho values (r s = 0.369). The Luminal A subtype had a significantly lower T1rho value than other subtypes (56.46 ± 10.553 vs. 66.58 ± 9.204 ms). The Luminal B subtype had significantly lower T1rho values than the triple-negative (TN) subtype (63.957 ± 9.794 vs. 72.237 ± 8.229 ms). The TN subtype had a significantly higher T1rho value than luminal subtypes (72.237 ± 8.229 vs. 62.903 ± 10.289 ms). The T1rho values had good diagnostic performance in identifying Luminal A and TN breast cancers with areas under the ROC curve of 0.767 and 0.776.
Data Conclusion:
T1rho mapping has the potential to be a non-invasive imaging biomarker for evaluating the prognostic biomarkers and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
