Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2025

07:35
Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
Published on: June 8, 2020
7.0K
Stool-based methylated syndecan-2 testing has a high positive predictive value in an average/increased-risk
Xinxin Huang1, Song Zhang1, Yanmei Liu2
1Department of Gastroenterology/Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Gastroenterology Report
|August 20, 2025
Summary
The methylated syndecan-2 (mSDC2) stool DNA test shows a high positive predictive value for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia and colorectal cancer. This non-invasive test is a promising alternative screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Gastroenterology
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is crucial for early detection and improved patient outcomes.
- Non-invasive screening methods are highly desirable for increasing population adherence.
- Stool DNA testing using methylated syndecan-2 (mSDC2) has emerged as a potential non-invasive CRC screening tool.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) of the mSDC2 stool DNA test in a real-world clinical setting.
- To identify risk factors associated with the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) in patients with a positive mSDC2 test.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of patients with positive mSDC2 tests across 18 hospitals (November 2016 - July 2021).
- Patients were categorized by risk (average vs. increased) and prior colonoscopy history (previous negative vs. none).
- Multivariate logistic regression analyzed risk factors for ACN detection.
Main Results:
- The overall PPV for ACN, CRC, and any colorectal neoplasia was 28.5%, 12.8%, and 44.6%, respectively.
- PPV for ACN was significantly higher in patients with no prior colonoscopy (30.1%) compared to those with a previous negative colonoscopy (18.5%).
- Increased risk populations showed a higher PPV for ACN (41.1%) versus average-risk populations (21.6%). Old age, increased risk, and smoking were independent risk factors for ACN, while previous negative colonoscopy was protective.
Conclusions:
- The mSDC2 stool DNA test demonstrates a high PPV for ACN and CRC, positioning it as a viable alternative CRC screening strategy.
- Patients with a positive mSDC2 test should undergo prompt colonoscopy, irrespective of prior colonoscopy results.
- The test's effectiveness is supported by its performance across different risk groups and patient histories.

