Heterogeneity of progression-free-survival surrogacy by sex in randomized trials testing immunotherapy in NSCLC
- Eleonora Pagan 1, Isabella Sala 1,2, Laura Pala 3,4, Fabrizio Natali 1, Federico Merlo 1, Chiara Oriecuia 5,6, Claudia Specchia 5, Tommaso De Pas 3, Chiara Catania 3, Emilia Cocorocchio 3, Daniele Laszlo 3, Giovanni Ceresoli 3, Marzia Locatelli 3, Priscilla Cascetta 3, Flaminia Facella 3, Benedetta Tinterri 3, Martina Pino 3, Jacopo Canzian 3, Giuseppe Giaccone 7, Vincenzo Bagnardi 1, Fabio Conforti 3,4
- Eleonora Pagan 1, Isabella Sala 1,2, Laura Pala 3,4
- 1Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
- 2Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
- 3Department of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy.
- 4Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
- 5Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
- 6Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
- 7Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornel Medicine, New York, USA.
- 0Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Progression-free survival (PFS) is a reliable surrogate for overall survival (OS) in male patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, this surrogacy is not robust in female patients.
Area Of Science
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
- Biostatistics
Background
- Progression-free survival (PFS) is often used as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in clinical trials for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown efficacy in treating advanced NSCLC.
- The validity of PFS as a surrogate for OS may vary based on patient characteristics, such as sex, which has not been previously investigated.
Purpose Of The Study
- To investigate potential sex-based differences in the trial-level surrogacy of PFS for OS in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICIs.
- To assess whether the association between PFS and OS differs between male and female patients.
Main Methods
- A systematic review of RCTs evaluating ICIs (monotherapy or combination) in advanced NSCLC was conducted.
- Hazard ratios (HR) for PFS and OS, stratified by patient sex, were extracted.
- The coefficient of determination (R2) was used to quantify the surrogacy of PFS for OS, overall and in subgroups based on treatment type.
Main Results
- Twenty RCTs comprising 7,528 male and 3,008 female patients were analyzed.
- Overall surrogacy of PFS for OS was moderate (adjusted R2=0.69).
- Significant heterogeneity was observed: PFS was a strong surrogate for OS in males (adjusted R2=0.77) but a poor surrogate in females (adjusted R2=0.31).
Conclusions
- Progression-free survival serves as a robust surrogate endpoint for overall survival in male patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs.
- The surrogacy of PFS for OS is not reliable in female patients within the same clinical context.
- These findings highlight the need for sex-specific considerations in the interpretation of clinical trial endpoints for advanced NSCLC.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

