Outcomes After Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome With Convexity Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Individual

Isabel Charlotte Hostettler1,2,3, Ana Ponciano1, Duncan Wilson1

  • 1Stroke Research Centre, University College London, Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom.

Neurology
|August 20, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Patients with convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage (cSAH) due to reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) have a good prognosis. Most patients achieve functional independence with low rates of recurrent vascular events like cSAH, ICH, or ischemic stroke.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Vascular Neurology
  • Neurocritical Care

Background:

  • Convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage (cSAH) in younger patients is often caused by reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS).
  • Limited data exist on long-term outcomes and functional recovery after RCVS-associated cSAH.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the rates of recurrent cSAH, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and ischemic stroke after RCVS-associated cSAH.
  • To evaluate functional outcomes and mortality in these patients.
  • To identify baseline predictors for these outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Individual patient data from a pooled analysis of 21 eligible cohorts (138 patients) were used.
  • Systematic literature search conducted in PubMed and EMBASE.
  • Follow-up was truncated at 5 years, with outcomes including recurrent cSAH, ICH, ischemic stroke, mortality, and modified Rankin Score (mRS).

Main Results:

  • During a mean follow-up of 1.8 years, annual recurrence rates for cSAH, ICH, and ischemic stroke were all 0.81%.
  • Most patients (94.3%) achieved a modified Rankin Score of ≤1, indicating minimal to no disability.
  • Two deaths occurred (annual rate 0.5%), both within two months of the initial cSAH event.

Conclusions:

  • RCVS-associated cSAH generally has a favorable prognosis with low rates of recurrent vascular events.
  • A high proportion of patients achieve functional independence.
  • Findings provide valuable prognostic information for clinical practice, despite limitations of retrospective data collection and potential selection bias.
Abstract