Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

06:18
Quantifying the Effects of Antimicrobials on In vitro Biofilm Architecture using COMSTAT Software
Published on: December 14, 2020
3.5K
Flow geometry effect on Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 biofilm structure
Dimitrios I Avgoulas1, Daniela Festa2, Maria Petala3
1Laboratory of Chemical and Environmental Technology, Department of Chemistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece.
Colloids and Surfaces. B, Biointerfaces
|August 20, 2025
Summary
Flow path geometry significantly impacts biofilm structure. Stainless steel electropolished (SSEP) surfaces promote thicker biofilms than Teflon fluoroethylenepropylene (FEP), especially in zig-zag channels, highlighting the interplay between surface material and fluid dynamics.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Biomaterials Science
- Fluid Dynamics
Background:
- Biofilm formation is influenced by surface properties and fluid flow.
- Understanding these interactions is crucial for controlling microbial growth in various environments.
- Previous studies have explored surface material effects, but the combined impact of flow path geometry and material is less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how flow path geometry affects Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 biofilm structure.
- To compare biofilm formation on stainless steel electropolished (SSEP) and Teflon fluoroethylenepropylene (FEP) surfaces.
- To elucidate the combined effects of surface material and flow channel design on biofilm development.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a custom experimental setup with vertically oriented, millimeter-scale flow channels.
- Employed two channel types: straight and square-wave (zig-zag) flow paths.
- Quantified biofilm thickness and structure using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and custom Matlab software analysis.
Main Results:
- Stainless steel electropolished (SSEP) surfaces consistently supported thicker, more uniform biofilms than Teflon fluoroethylenepropylene (FEP).
- Square-wave channels led to significantly thicker biofilms, particularly on SSEP, with enhanced accumulation along the downstream zig-zag path.
- FEP surfaces showed detachment in certain zig-zag sections, unlike the accumulation observed on SSEP.
Conclusions:
- Biofilm structure is critically dependent on the interplay between surface material properties and flow path geometry.
- SSEP surfaces are more conducive to robust biofilm accumulation, especially under complex flow conditions.
- Flow path design, particularly the introduction of geometric changes like zig-zags, can significantly enhance or disrupt biofilm formation depending on the surface material.

