Phthalate esters in riverine systems: A comprehensive review of their occurrence, detection, environmental fate, and ecotoxicological impacts
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Collection of Alfalfa Root Exudates to Study the Impact of Di2-ethylhexyl Phthalate on Metabolite Production
Published on: June 2, 2023
Fateme Barari1, Masoume Farashiani1, Ziaeddin Bonyadi2
1Student Research Committee, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Abstract:
Phthalate esters (PAEs), which are widely used as plasticizers in various industrial processes, pose significant risks to ecosystems and human health as emerging pollutants. This study aimed to compare different methods for extracting PAEs, quantifying their concentrations, and assessing the health risks associated with exposure to these contaminants. Based on the reviewed studies, solid-phase extraction (SPE) was the preferred sample preparation technique in approximately 60 % of cases due to its efficiency, low solvent consumption, and strong enrichment capabilities. Moreover, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was the most commonly used detection method, applied in 78.8 % of the studies for accurate quantification. The reported concentrations of PAEs in river water ranged from 100 to 300,000 ng/L. Studies indicated that di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and dibutyl phthalate (DBP) were the most frequently detected PAEs, present in 90 % and 91.25 % of river systems, respectively. Peak concentrations were reported as 60 μg/L in water, 41.4 μg/g in sediments, and 1.586 μg/g in aquatic organisms. Studies have indicated that both DEHP and DBP exhibit high Risk Quotient (RQ > 1) values, suggesting significant ecological risks to aquatic organisms. These risks include potential endocrine disruption, growth inhibition, and metabolic dysfunction, as observed in environmental studies. Additionally, some studies have reported high Hazard Quotient (HQ > 1) values for human exposure, indicating possible non-carcinogenic health effects resulting from chronic intake. Effective monitoring and mitigation strategies are essential to minimize the environmental and public health impacts of PAEs. Overall, this review highlights the widespread occurrence and persistence of PAEs in riverine environments, emphasizing their potential to disrupt ecological balance and pose health risks. Continued research, along with stricter regulatory measures, is crucial to control their release and safeguard environmental and human health.
More Related Videos
09:33Phthalic Acid Ester-Binding DNA Aptamer Selection, Characterization, and Application to an Electrochemical Aptasensor
Published on: March 21, 2018
09:49Use of a Battery of Chemical and Ecotoxicological Methods for the Assessment of the Efficacy of Wastewater Treatment Processes to Remove Estrogenic Potency
Published on: September 11, 2016
Related Concept Videos
The Phosphorus Cycle
Types of Toxins
Air pollutants, primarily gases, pose significant threats to respiratory health, leading to conditions like hypoxia, lung cancer, and in extreme cases, death.
Environmental pollutants like...
Types of Step-Growth Polymers: Polyesters
Polyesters are commonly prepared from terephthalic acid and ethylene glycol; the crude product is known as poly(ethylene terephthalate) or PET. However, polyesters are synthesized industrially by transesterification of dimethyl terephthalate with ethylene glycol at 150 °C. The two reactants and the...
Toxic Reactions: Overview
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...