Serum LACC1 level is a predictor of response to upadacitinib treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective observational cohort study
- Zhou Yang 1, YuWei Zhan 1, ShuDian Lin 2
- Zhou Yang 1, YuWei Zhan 1, ShuDian Lin 2
- 1Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Medical University Hainan Hospital), No.19 Xiuhua Road, Xiuying District, Haikou City, 570311, Hainan Province, China.
- 2Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Medical University Hainan Hospital), No.19 Xiuhua Road, Xiuying District, Haikou City, 570311, Hainan Province, China. linsd0110@163.com.
- 0Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Medical University Hainan Hospital), No.19 Xiuhua Road, Xiuying District, Haikou City, 570311, Hainan Province, China.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Higher serum LACC1 levels predict a better response to upadacitinib (UPA) treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. This finding may help personalize RA treatment strategies for improved outcomes.
Area Of Science
- Rheumatology
- Immunology
- Pharmacology
Background
- Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease.
- Upadacitinib (UPA) is a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor used for RA treatment.
- Predicting treatment response in RA is crucial for effective management.
Purpose Of The Study
- To investigate the predictive role of LACC1 in upadacitinib (UPA) response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
- To identify factors associated with treatment response to UPA in RA patients.
Main Methods
- Sixty adult RA patients with inadequate response or intolerance to methotrexate were included.
- Patients received UPA monotherapy (15 mg/day) for 24 weeks.
- Treatment response was evaluated using disease activity indices, joint counts, and patient-reported outcomes.
Main Results
- Higher serum LACC1 levels were associated with a good response to UPA.
- Factors like prolonged disease duration, increased tender joint count, low neutrophil count, and high GM-CSF levels predicted a poor response.
- Age, csDMARD use, and inflammatory markers also correlated with non-response.
Conclusions
- Elevated serum LACC1 levels indicate better efficacy of UPA in RA patients.
- These findings support the potential for individualized dosing strategies based on LACC1 levels.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

