Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Grafting the projecting nasal tip.

M B Constantian

    Annals of Plastic Surgery
    |May 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study explores when cartilage grafting improves nasal tip projection in primary rhinoplasty. The authors found that grafting is most effective when there is a significant discrepancy between skin sleeve and skeletal volumes. They also suggest that small nasal tips requiring structural changes may benefit from grafting. The study does not claim that grafting is always necessary but proposes that it is valuable in specific conditions. The findings may help surgeons decide when to use grafting in nasal surgery. The authors recommend further research to confirm these findings in larger populations.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Conflicts of interest in medical writing and the concept of disclosure.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2000
    Same author

    Four common anatomic variants that predispose to unfavorable rhinoplasty results: a study based on 150 consecutive secondary rhinoplasties.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2000
    Same author

    The Gordian knot of multiple authorship.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1999
    Same author

    Elaboration of an alternative, segmental, cartilage-sparing tip graft technique: experience in 405 cases.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1999
    Same author

    An alar base flap to correct nostril and vestibular stenosis and alar base malposition in rhinoplasty.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1998
    Same author

    Reflections of a career in progress.

    Annals of plastic surgery·1998

    Area of Science:

    • Plastic surgery techniques
    • Nasal reconstruction methods
    • Aesthetic surgery outcomes research

    Background:

    Current knowledge in nasal surgery includes the use of cartilage grafts to modify nasal tip projection. However, a gap remains in understanding when such grafts are most beneficial. Prior research has shown that altering alar cartilages alone can achieve satisfactory results in many cases. But when skin sleeve and skeletal volumes differ significantly, grafting may be necessary. This uncertainty drove the need to define specific conditions for graft use. No prior work had resolved how grafting affects small nasal tips. The literature lacks clear guidelines on when grafting is preferable. This gap motivated a detailed analysis of grafting outcomes in primary rhinoplasty. The study aimed to clarify the role of grafting in nasal tip projection.

    Purpose Of The Study:

    The purpose of this study was to determine when cartilage grafting improves nasal tip projection in primary rhinoplasty. The authors sought to identify specific anatomical conditions where grafting is most effective. They focused on cases where skin sleeve and skeletal volumes differ significantly. The study also examined small nasal tips requiring structural changes. The goal was to define clear criteria for graft use in nasal surgery. The authors aimed to provide evidence-based guidance for surgeons. They wanted to clarify when grafting is necessary versus when it is optional. The study's findings may help standardize surgical approaches for nasal tip projection.

    Keywords:
    Nasal surgery techniquesCartilage grafting benefitsNasal tip projection methodsPrimary rhinoplasty outcomes

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The authors propose that grafting is most beneficial when there is a significant discrepancy between skin sleeve and skeletal volumes.

    The study suggests that small nasal tips requiring structural changes may benefit from cartilage grafting.

    The authors propose that this discrepancy may affect nasal tip projection and require grafting to correct.

    The study suggests that grafting may enhance results when modifying alar cartilages alone is insufficient.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    The study used primary rhinoplasty cases to analyze the effects of cartilage grafting. The authors defined criteria for identifying suitable candidates for grafting. They compared outcomes between patients who received grafts and those who did not. The analysis focused on nasal tip projection and structural changes. The study examined the relationship between skin sleeve and skeletal volumes. The authors used clinical observations to assess graft effectiveness. They documented changes in nasal tip configuration after surgery. The methods included both quantitative measurements and qualitative assessments.

    Main Results:

    The strongest finding was that cartilage grafting improved nasal tip projection in specific cases. Patients with significant discrepancies between skin sleeve and skeletal volumes benefited most. Grafting also enhanced results in small nasal tips requiring structural changes. The study showed that grafting is not always necessary but is valuable in certain conditions. The authors reported that grafting can correct nasal tip asymmetry and projection. The results suggest that grafting is most effective when other methods are insufficient. The study found no significant benefit in cases where grafting was unnecessary. These findings may guide surgeons in selecting appropriate candidates for grafting.

    Conclusions:

    The authors concluded that cartilage grafting can enhance nasal tip projection in specific cases. They emphasized that grafting is most effective when skin sleeve and skeletal volumes differ. The study suggests that grafting is not always necessary but is valuable in certain conditions. The findings may help surgeons decide when to use grafting in primary rhinoplasty. The authors propose that grafting is most beneficial in small nasal tips requiring structural changes. They suggest that grafting should be used when modifying alar cartilages alone is insufficient. The study does not claim that grafting is essential in all cases. The authors recommend further research to confirm these findings in larger populations.

    The authors propose that grafting can improve nasal tip projection in specific cases.

    The authors suggest that grafting should be used when other methods are insufficient to achieve desired results.