Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

43.5K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
43.5K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

122
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
122
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

79.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
79.5K
Instrument Calibration01:12

Instrument Calibration

266
Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
266
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

2.1K
A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
2.1K
Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

81
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
81

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional dual-slope frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy data interpreted with two- and three-layer models.

Biophotonics discovery·2026
Same author

Noninvasive measurements of skeletal muscle hemodynamics using frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy: contributions from adipose and bone tissues.

Biophotonics discovery·2026
Same author

Critical analysis of the relationship between arterial saturation and the ratio-of-ratios used in pulse oximetry.

Journal of biomedical optics·2025
Same author

The fNIRS glossary project: a consensus-based resource for functional near-infrared spectroscopy terminology.

Neurophotonics·2025
Same author

Frequency-domain instrument with custom ASIC for dual-slope near-infrared spectroscopy.

The Review of scientific instruments·2024
Same author

Dual-ratio approach to pulse oximetry and the effect of skin tone.

Journal of biomedical optics·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.4K

Influence of Uncertainties in Optode Positions on Self-Calibrating or Dual-Slope Diffuse Optical Measurements.

Giles Blaney1, Angelo Sassaroli1, Tapan Das2

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby Street, Medford MA 02155, USA.

Photonics
|August 21, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Accurate optode positioning is crucial for diffuse optics measurements. Small errors in source and detector positions significantly impact scattering measurements more than absorption, especially for absolute values.

Keywords:
absorption coefficientdual-slopeoptode geometryreduced scattering coefficientself-calibratingtissue spectroscopy

More Related Videos

Real-Time Monitoring of Neurocritical Patients with Diffuse Optical Spectroscopies
07:12

Real-Time Monitoring of Neurocritical Patients with Diffuse Optical Spectroscopies

Published on: November 19, 2020

2.2K
Calibration Procedures for Orthogonal Superposition Rheology
08:43

Calibration Procedures for Orthogonal Superposition Rheology

Published on: November 18, 2020

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.4K
Real-Time Monitoring of Neurocritical Patients with Diffuse Optical Spectroscopies
07:12

Real-Time Monitoring of Neurocritical Patients with Diffuse Optical Spectroscopies

Published on: November 19, 2020

2.2K
Calibration Procedures for Orthogonal Superposition Rheology
08:43

Calibration Procedures for Orthogonal Superposition Rheology

Published on: November 18, 2020

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Diffuse optics
  • Biomedical optics
  • Photonics

Background:

  • Self-calibrating and dual-slope measurements are vital for assessing optical properties in scattering media like biological tissue.
  • These techniques utilize optical probes with multiple source and detector positions for robust measurements.
  • Accurate assessment of absolute values and temporal changes relies on precise probe geometry.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively analyze the impact of source and detector position errors on optical property assessment.
  • To evaluate the influence of optode positioning uncertainties on scattering and absorption coefficients.
  • To identify optimal optode arrangements and error tolerances for improved measurement accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical computations based on diffusion theory for semi-infinite homogeneous media.
  • Analysis of linear, trapezoidal, and rectangular optode arrangements.
  • Simulation of position uncertainties for sources and detectors.

Main Results:

  • Optode position uncertainties have a greater impact on scattering coefficients than absorption coefficients for absolute measurements.
  • A 1 mm displacement in a linear arrangement can lead to average errors of 4.1% for absorption and 19% for scattering.
  • Position errors have a smaller impact on measurements of absorption changes compared to absolute values.

Conclusions:

  • Precise optode positioning is critical for accurate diffuse optics measurements, particularly for scattering coefficients.
  • Understanding the impact of position errors guides the design of more robust optical probes.
  • Optimizing optode geometry can minimize measurement uncertainties in self-calibrating and dual-slope systems.