Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

20.1K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
20.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nanozymatic platform for dual colorimetric and fluorimetric sensing of H₂O₂ and glucose using Ni-CoWO₄ nanoparticles.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Time-delay reservoir for signal demixing using Kalman weight updates in fixed point and limit cycle regimes.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Myelin Supports Cortical Circuit Function Underlying Skilled Movement.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

How heterogeneity shapes dynamics and computation in the brain.

Neuron·2025
Same author

Sustained attention in attention-deficit subjects and the impact of binaural beat stimulation evaluated by behavior and EEG.

Experimental brain research·2025
Same author

Surfing brain waves without sinking: A commentary on "Entrainment by transcranial alternating current stimulation: Insight from models of cortical oscillations and dynamical systems theory" by M. Madadi Asl and A. Valizadeh.

Physics of life reviews·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

A Galvanotaxis Assay for Analysis of Neural Precursor Cell Migration Kinetics in an Externally Applied Direct Current Electric Field
11:00

A Galvanotaxis Assay for Analysis of Neural Precursor Cell Migration Kinetics in an Externally Applied Direct Current Electric Field

Published on: October 13, 2012

12.6K

Morphological variability may limit single-cell specificity to electric field stimulation.

Daniel Trotter1,2, Aref Pariz2,3, Axel Hutt4

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
|August 21, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Non-invasive brain stimulation specificity is limited at the cellular level. Morphological variability in neurons blurs subtype-specific responses to electric fields, questioning precise neural circuit control.

Keywords:
computational modelingnon-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS)single neuron modeltranscranial electric stimulationuniform electric field

More Related Videos

External Excitation of Neurons Using Electric and Magnetic Fields in One- and Two-dimensional Cultures
08:32

External Excitation of Neurons Using Electric and Magnetic Fields in One- and Two-dimensional Cultures

Published on: May 7, 2017

13.5K
Electric-Field-Induced Neural Precursor Cell Differentiation in Microfluidic Devices
07:15

Electric-Field-Induced Neural Precursor Cell Differentiation in Microfluidic Devices

Published on: April 14, 2021

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

A Galvanotaxis Assay for Analysis of Neural Precursor Cell Migration Kinetics in an Externally Applied Direct Current Electric Field
11:00

A Galvanotaxis Assay for Analysis of Neural Precursor Cell Migration Kinetics in an Externally Applied Direct Current Electric Field

Published on: October 13, 2012

12.6K
External Excitation of Neurons Using Electric and Magnetic Fields in One- and Two-dimensional Cultures
08:32

External Excitation of Neurons Using Electric and Magnetic Fields in One- and Two-dimensional Cultures

Published on: May 7, 2017

13.5K
Electric-Field-Induced Neural Precursor Cell Differentiation in Microfluidic Devices
07:15

Electric-Field-Induced Neural Precursor Cell Differentiation in Microfluidic Devices

Published on: April 14, 2021

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques modulate neural excitability and behavior.
  • Understanding cellular-level specificity of these techniques remains limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the specificity of non-invasive brain stimulation at the individual neuron level.
  • To quantify the susceptibility of different neuronal compartments to uniform electric fields based on morphology.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized realistic pyramidal and parvalbumin neuron morphologies from the Allen Institute.
  • Developed metrics to quantify cellular morphology (e.g., branching, diameter, orientation).
  • Simulated responses of single-cell models to uniform electric fields.

Main Results:

  • No significant layer- or cell-type-specific responses were found based on physical traits alone.
  • Uniform electric fields modulated somatic, dendritic, and axonal compartments.
  • Observed subtype-specific responses were obscured by significant morphological variability.

Conclusions:

  • Neuronal morphology alone may not explain subtype-specific responses to electric field stimulation.
  • The precise control of specific neural circuit components by non-invasive techniques is questionable.
  • Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying stimulation specificity.