Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Lifecycles of Cochrane Systematic Reviews (2003-2024): A Bibliographic Study
Shiyin Li1, Chong Wu2,3, Zichen Zhang2
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of Arizona Tucson AZ USA.
Background And Objectives:
The relevance of Cochrane systematic reviews depends on timely completion and updates. This study aimed to empirically assess the lifecycles of Cochrane reviews published from 2003 to 2024, including transitions from protocol to review, update patterns, and withdrawals.
Methods:
We extracted data from Cochrane Library publications between 2003 and 2024. Each review topic was identified using a unique six-digit DOI-based ID. We recorded protocol publication, review publication, updates, and withdrawals (i.e., removed from the Cochrane Library for editorial or procedural reasons), calculating time intervals between stages and conducting subgroup analyses by review type.
Results:
Of 8137 protocols, 71.9% progressed to reviews (median 25.7 months), 2.4% were updated during the protocol stage, and 10.0% were withdrawn. Among 8477 reviews, 64.3% were never updated by the time of our analysis; for those updated at least once, the median interval between updates was 57.2 months. Withdrawal occurred in 2.5% of reviews (median 67.6 months post-publication). Subgroup analyses showed variation across review types; diagnostic and qualitative reviews tended to have longer protocol-to-review times than other types of reviews.
Conclusions:
Cochrane reviews show long development and update intervals, with variation by review type. Greater use of automation and targeted support may improve review efficiency and timeliness.
More Related Videos
07:50Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
Published on: April 18, 2025
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Chi-square Analysis
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
The Cell Cycle Control System
Clinical Trials: Overview
Retrovirus Life Cycles