Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

174
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
174
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design01:28

Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design

1.0K
Drug design is a dynamic field that involves discovering and developing new medications based on specific biological targets. This process heavily relies on structure-activity relationships (SAR) and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) to guide the design and optimization of efficient drugs.
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
1.0K
Drug Discovery: Overview01:26

Drug Discovery: Overview

8.7K
Drug discovery is a multifaceted process involving extensive screening, testing, and optimization of lead compounds to identify potential new drugs for therapeutic use. It combines several approaches, including screening large numbers of natural products, chemical modification of known active molecules, identification of new drug targets, and rational design based on biological mechanisms and drug-receptor structure. These approaches are carried out in both academic research laboratories and...
8.7K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

155
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
155
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions01:29

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

2.4K
Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
2.4K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

24.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
24.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does Digital Make a Difference? Willingness-to-Pay for Digital Versus Offline Weight Loss in Germany.

Obesity science & practice·2026
Same author

The role of assistive devices and technologies in the activities and participation in everyday life of children with cerebral palsy - a scoping review.

Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology·2025
Same author

Impact of Contextual Factors on the Perceived Participation of People With Multiple Sclerosis and Gait Impairment Using Mobility Assistive Devices: A Qualitative Analysis.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2024
Same author

Priority setting to support a public health research agenda: a modified Delphi study with public health stakeholders in Germany.

Health research policy and systems·2023
Same author

Revisiting the Swedish alcohol stasis after changes in travelers' allowances in 2004: petrol prices provide a piece of the puzzle.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care·2021
Same author

Projections of incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and incident type 2 diabetes across evolving statin treatment guidelines and recommendations: A modelling study.

PLoS medicine·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.0K

Optimizing Research Impact: A Toolkit for Stakeholder-Driven Prioritization of Systematic Review Topics.

Dyon Hoekstra1,2,3, Stefan K Lhachimi1,2,4

  • 1Research Group for Evidence-Based Public Health, Leibniz-Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology (BIPS), Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research (IPP), University of Bremen Bremen Germany.

Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods
|August 21, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This toolkit offers a structured, 11-step framework for involving stakeholders in evidence synthesis topic prioritization. It ensures research priority setting is relevant, applicable, and resource-efficient.

Keywords:
Delphi techniquePICOpriority settingstakeholder involvementsystematic reviewtoolkit

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.0K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Health Research Methodology
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • Research Prioritization

Background:

  • Prioritizing topics for evidence synthesis is critical for maximizing the impact of systematic reviews.
  • Engaging diverse stakeholders ensures the relevance and applicability of selected research topics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a comprehensive toolkit for a structured, multi-step framework for stakeholder engagement in evidence synthesis topic prioritization.
  • To facilitate the selection of relevant and applicable topics for systematic reviews.

Main Methods:

  • An open-source framework with 11 steps, divided into scoping and Delphi stages.
  • Provides ready-to-use tools, including online survey templates developed with free, open-source software.
  • Ensures ease of replication and adaptation across various research fields.

Main Results:

  • The framework supports transparent and systematic development and assessment of systematic review topics.
  • Focuses on stakeholder-refined assessment criteria for topic evaluation.
  • Enhances the transparency and ease of the priority-setting process.

Conclusions:

  • The toolkit is a valuable resource for organizations and research groups making informed decisions on research prioritization.
  • Aims to allocate resources for future research based on identified stakeholder needs.
  • Promotes efficient and stakeholder-driven research agenda setting.