Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy Based on the Inverse Electron Demand Diels-Alder Reaction
Published on: January 29, 2019
Intermediate endpoints as surrogates for long-term outcomes in breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy trials
Andrea Blasco1, Sara López-Tarruella2,3, Ander Urruticoechea1,4
1GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, San Sebastián de los Reyes 28703, Spain.
Importance And Objective:
Several definitions of efficacy endpoints have been proposed for clinical trials in early breast cancer (EBC). Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and other endpoints have been used as surrogates for overall survival (OS) in adjuvant trials. The aim was to evaluate these endpoints in a comparative way in a large cohort of patients to assess whether they are appropriate surrogates for OS.
Participants And Design:
Individual patient data from 8 phase III randomized adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) trials for EBC were analyzed. Trial-level surrogacy analyses were conducted using weighted least squares regression to assess the association between treatment effects on surrogates at different time points-IDFS and other defined endpoints (by STEEP v2.0)-and OS. Correlation between the log hazard ratio (HR) of the endpoints and OS were quantified using R2 values. Preplanned subgroup analyses by tumor subtype were also performed.
Results:
Results censoring at 5 years and at longer follow-up (median: 9.6 years) were similar. HR of IDFS and invasive BC-free survival (IBCFS) at 5 years showed a R2 > 0.7 relative to HR of OS. All other surrogates revealed correlations with R2 > 0.5. For patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative intermediate/high-risk tumors, correlation showed higher R2 for IDFS (R2 = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.80-0.98]) and IBCFS (R2 = 0.84; 95% CI = [0.71-0.97]) than distant-recurrence endpoints, while for those with triple negative tumors the highest correlation was seen with distant disease-free survival (R2 = 0.86; 95% CI = [0.75-0.98]).
Conclusions And Relevance:
Although all studied endpoints are appropriate surrogates for OS when evaluating CT-based adjuvant interventions, investigators should consider the BC subtype to select the primary endpoint. Trial registration number: ClinTrials.gov: GEICAM/9805: NCT00121992; GEICAM/9906: NCT00129922; GEICAM/2003-02: NCT00129389; GEICAM/2003-10: NCT00129935; CIBOMA/2004-01_GEICAM/2003-11: NCT00130533; BCIRG 001: NCT00688740; BCIRG 005: NCT00312208 and BCIRG 006: NCT00021255.
More Related Videos
04:04Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...