Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Stakeholder Perspectives on the Responsible Innovation in Health Framework for Addressing Stigma-Based Health
Sébastien Finlay1,2, Geneviève Lamoureux1,2, Anne Moïse-Richard1,3
1School of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
This study explored how stakeholders envision health innovations to reduce stuttering stigma using the Responsible Innovation in Health (RIH) framework. Findings emphasize co-design and sustainability for equitable, feasible interventions for people who stutter (PWS).
Area of Science:
- Health Equity Research
- Stuttering Intervention Design
- Responsible Innovation in Health (RIH) Framework Application
Background:
- People who stutter (PWS) face stigma-based health inequalities impacting quality of life and access to care.
- Existing interventions often lack explicit design to address systemic disparities for PWS.
- The Responsible Innovation in Health (RIH) framework offers a model for equitable, sustainable, and contextually responsive health innovations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore stakeholder interpretations and applications of the RIH framework for envisioning interventions.
- To identify strategies for reducing stigma and promoting health equity for PWS.
- To understand how RIH principles can guide the development of tailored, context-specific interventions for stuttering.
Main Methods:
- A mixed-methods design utilizing the Participative Concept Mapping Approach.
- Stakeholders (PWS, clinicians, health innovators) participated in a workshop.
- Concept mapping was used to generate, sort, rate ideas, and perform thematic analysis.
Main Results:
- Stakeholders generated 94 ideas across six thematic clusters, including digital technology, collective approaches, cost/accessibility, inclusive design, multi-modal engagement, and flexibility.
- The environmental responsibility aspect of the RIH framework received limited attention.
- Discrepancies in idea importance and feasibility highlighted implementation and sustainability challenges.
Conclusions:
- Stakeholders prioritize RIH values when envisioning stigma-reducing health innovations for PWS.
- Embedding sustainability into clinical practices and incorporating user feedback are crucial for developing meaningful and feasible interventions.
- Co-designing interventions grounded in the lived experiences of PWS is essential for promoting health equity.
Related Concept Videos
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Health Literacy
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...

