Diagnostic yield and multivariable-dimensionality analysis of head trauma decision rules in infants under 3 months

Remzi Çetinkaya1, Ali Cankut Tatlıparmak2, Mehmet Özel1

  • 1University of Health Sciences, Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Diyarbakır, Türkiye.

Insights

The CHALICE rule identified all traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) in infants under 3 months, outperforming PECARN and CATCH. Data-driven risk stratification using multivariable modeling and dimensionality reduction is recommended for pediatric TBI.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Emergency Medicine
  • Neurotrauma
  • Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • Traumatic brain injury (TBI) in infants under 3 months presents diagnostic challenges due to nonspecific symptoms.
  • Clinical decision-making for TBI in this age group is complex.
  • Evaluating established clinical decision rules is crucial for accurate diagnosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the diagnostic yield of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE clinical decision rules for TBI in infants under 3 months.
  • To compare the effectiveness of these rules in identifying TBI in young infants.
  • To explore advanced analytical methods for TBI risk stratification.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 151 infants (0-3 months) who underwent cranial CT after blunt head trauma.
  • Application and evaluation of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE rules.
  • Utilized multivariable logistic regression and dimensionality reduction (t-SNE, UMAP) for pattern exploration.

Main Results:

  • Twenty infants (13.2%) had CT-confirmed TBI.
  • Diagnostic yields were 14.8% (PECARN), 18.9% (CATCH), and 25.6% (CHALICE).
  • Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15 and post-traumatic seizure were significant predictors of TBI.

Conclusions:

  • The CHALICE rule demonstrated the highest diagnostic yield and detected all TBI cases in this cohort.
  • CHALICE achieved this with fewer CT scans compared to PECARN.
  • Integrated, data-driven risk stratification using advanced modeling shows promise for pediatric TBI.
Abstract