Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
Published on: July 11, 2025
Barriers and facilitators to nurses' adoption of artificial intelligence-driven solutions in clinical practice: a
Ravi Shankar1, Fiona Devi2, Emily Ang3
1National University Health System, Singapore Ravi_SHANKAR@nuhs.edu.sg.
Introduction:
Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly being developed and deployed to support clinical decision-making, care delivery and patient monitoring in healthcare. However, the adoption of AI-driven solutions by nurses, who comprise the largest segment of the healthcare workforce and are central to patient care, has been limited to date. Understanding nurses' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to AI adoption is critical for successful integration of AI in nursing practice. This systematic review aims to identify, appraise and synthesise qualitative evidence on nurses' perceived barriers and facilitators to adopting AI-driven solutions in their clinical practice.
Methods And Analysis:
We will conduct systematic searches across eight electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Scopus) from inception to January 2025, supplemented by hand-searching reference lists and grey literature. Primary qualitative studies and qualitative components of mixed-methods studies exploring licensed/registered nurses' perceptions of AI adoption in clinical settings will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen studies, extract data using standardised forms and assess methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. We will employ meta-ethnography to synthesise the qualitative evidence, involving systematic comparison and translation of concepts across studies to develop overarching themes and a theoretical framework. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) approach will be used to assess confidence in review findings. The protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines and the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement.
Ethics And Dissemination:
No ethical approval is required as this systematic review will synthesise data from published studies only. The findings will provide valuable insights to inform the development, implementation and evaluation of nurse-oriented strategies for AI integration in healthcare delivery. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and stakeholder engagement activities.
Prospero Registration Number:
CRD42024602808.
Related Concept Videos
Current Trends in Nursing II
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Current Trends in Nursing I
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:

