Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Abnormalities in Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis by Magnetic Resonance Microscopy Imaging in the Mouse
Published on: June 20, 2014
Misclassification of recovery in dilated cardiomyopathy by echocardiography as compared to cardiac MRI
David Mui1, Yuanwei Xu2, Neal K Pohlman3
1Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Insights
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides more accurate measurements of cardiac function than 2D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients. TTE overestimates ejection fraction, leading to significant misclassification of heart failure status and recovery.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Accurate assessment of cardiac function is crucial for diagnosing and managing dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and 2D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) are used to assess cardiac function, but their comparative impact on heart failure (HF) classification and ejection fraction (EF) improvement assessment in DCM is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and volumes measured by CMR and 2D-TTE in DCM patients.
- To evaluate the impact of these measurement differences on initial HF classification and subsequent assessment of myocardial recovery.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) from 130 DCM patients using CMR and 2D-TTE.
- Assessment of myocardial recovery in patients with improved EF (HFimpEF) based on both imaging modalities over a 12-48 month follow-up period.
Main Results:
- 2D-TTE significantly overestimated LVEF (8.3%) and underestimated LVEDV (-69.0 ml) and LVESV (-64.8 ml) compared to CMR.
- The overestimation of LVEF by TTE was more pronounced at lower EF values.
- This led to initial misclassification of 60% of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients and misclassification of myocardial recovery in 59% of DCM patients.
Conclusions:
- 2D-TTE measurements can lead to significant misclassification of heart failure status and myocardial recovery in DCM patients.
- These discrepancies may impact initial treatment decisions and long-term patient management.
- CMR offers a more accurate assessment of cardiac function in DCM, crucial for precise HF classification and monitoring treatment efficacy.
Abstract:
Accurate assessment of cardiac function is the cornerstone of DCM diagnosis and management. Studies have compared CMR and 2D-TTE but the impact of these measurements on HF classification and assessment of EF improvement has not been explored. We aim to compare left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and volumes as measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and two dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients in the initial EF based classification of heart failure (HF) and subsequent follow-up.We compared LVEF, LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and LV end-systolic volumes (ESV) measurements from 130 DCM patients during both their initial visit and their follow-up imaging 12-48 months later. We also assessed the myocardial recovery of patients who were classified as having HFimpEF (EF < 40% to EF ≥ 40% with at least a 10% increase in EF) by 2D-TTE and CMR. We found that 2D-TTE overestimated EF (8.3% (95% CI 7.2 to 9.4), p < 0.001) and underestimated LVEDV (-69.0 ml (95% CI -77.0 to -61.1), p < 0.001) and LVESV (-64.8 ml (95% CI -71.6 to -57.9) p < 0.001) as compared to CMR. The overestimation of EF was not uniform across the EF spectrum. The lower the LVEF, the greater the overestimation by TTE. This overestimation led to an initial misclassification of 60% of HFrEF patients and a subsequent misclassification of myocardial recovery in 59% of DCM patients. 2D-TTE misclassification of DCM patients may significantly impact the initial treatment choice and follow-up of heart failure patients.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion,...

