Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Author Spotlight: Quantifying Pain Experience – An Illustrative Approach Using the Pain Body Diagram
Published on: July 7, 2023
Functional Profile Differences Across Diagnostic Categories Using WHODAS 2.0 in Adults with Neurological,
Patricio Barria1, Asterio Andrade1, Bessié Córdova Albayay1
1Research and Development Area, Corporación de Rehabilitación Club de Leones Cruz del Sur, Punta Arenas 6210005, Chile.
This study used the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) to compare functional disability in neurological, musculoskeletal, and pain conditions. Neurological conditions showed the highest disability, especially in cognition and participation.
Area of Science:
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Gerontology
- Disability Studies
Background:
- Functional disability is a significant challenge in aging populations with chronic illnesses.
- Limited research exists comparing disability profiles across diagnostic categories using standardized assessments.
- Understanding these profiles is crucial for effective healthcare planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize functional profiles of adults with neurological, musculoskeletal, and chronic pain conditions using the WHODAS 2.0.
- To investigate differences in disability by age and sex across these conditions.
- To inform tailored rehabilitation strategies and resource allocation.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the 36-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0).
- Analyzed data from 419 participants (median age 73 years, 73% female) across neurological, musculoskeletal, and pain-related diagnostic groups.
- Employed non-parametric tests and Spearman correlations for domain-level score analysis.
Main Results:
- Neurological conditions exhibited the highest disability, particularly in cognition, interpersonal relations, and participation.
- Musculoskeletal conditions showed greater limitations in mobility and self-care.
- Women reported higher disability in the neurological group, with significant cognitive differences (p=0.048); age correlated with self-care and mobility impairments.
Conclusions:
- The WHODAS 2.0 effectively identifies domain-specific functional limitations across diverse clinical populations.
- Individualized, diagnosis- and gender-sensitive rehabilitation strategies are essential.
- WHODAS 2.0 data can guide targeted care planning and resource allocation in rehabilitation settings.
More Related Videos
14:27Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
Published on: June 26, 2013
06:28Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024