Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

A High-throughput Compatible Assay to Evaluate Drug Efficacy against Macrophage Passaged Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Published on: March 24, 2017
Efficacy & safety of high-dose rifampicin in pulmonary tuberculosis: A systematic review & meta-analysis
Bhavani Perumal Kannabiran1, Jayanthi Arthanari1, Adhin Bhaskar2
1Department of Clinical Research, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Abstract:
Background & objectives Evidence suggests that higher doses of rifampicin aid in faster culture conversion, but its effects on unfavourable outcomes are unclear. We aimed to synthesise evidence on the efficacy and safety of high-dose rifampicin (>15 mg/kg) containing anti-tuberculosis regimen compared to a regimen with standard dose of rifampicin in adults with pulmonary tuberculosis. Methods We searched for studies from MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library without geographical restriction. We included randomised controlled trials that evaluated high-dose rifampicin (>15 mg/kg for 8 wk) with a six-month duration. Our outcomes of interest were sputum conversion at eight wk, mortality, treatment failure at six months, Grade 3 and Grade 4 hepatotoxicity, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts and extracted data. We performed a meta-analysis using the RevMan web software as per the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Results Out of 3950 articles screened, we included nine for meta-analysis. High-dose rifampicin (≥15 mg/kg) showed little benefit compared to the standard dose for sputum conversion at eight wk [(83% vs. 78%, Relative risk (RR) 1.05 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-1.09), Number needed to treat (NNT)-24)] and this benefit was higher as the rifampicin dose increased [20-30 mg RR: 1.07 (95% CI 1.02-1.14), NNT-17]; >30 mg RR: 1.12 (95% CI 1.04 -1.20) NNT-9]. However, treatment failure and mortality showed no benefit with high-dose rifampicin. Grade 3 and 4 hepatotoxicity and treatment discontinuation due to toxicity had a dose-response relationship and were significantly higher in the more than 30 mg/kg group [RR: 4.01 (95%CI 1.75-9.19), Number needed to harm -20]. Interpretation & conclusions High doses of rifampicin (≥15 mg/kg) increased the rate of sputum culture conversion after two months of the intensive phase. There was no difference in mortality and treatment failure between high-dose rifampicin and standard arms. In the subgroup analysis, the 20-30 mg/kg dose exhibited a beneficial effect in sputum conversion with no significant risk of hepatotoxicity and adverse drug reactions (ADR) leading to treatment discontinuation. This dose could be administered with close monitoring of adverse events and hepatotoxicity. There is an urgent need for adequately powered trials that assess long-term treatment outcomes, including recurrence.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis II
Here is a detailed explanation of its pathophysiology:
Transmission: The process begins when a person inhales droplet nuclei containing M. tuberculosis. These are typically released into the air when an individual with pulmonary or...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis III
The first classification is based on the development of the disease, and it includes the following categories:

