Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

965
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
965
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

282
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
282
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

79.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
79.5K
Correlations02:20

Correlations

33.8K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
33.8K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.5K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.5K
Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

201
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
201

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Internal electric fields enable piezocatalytic H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> production in BiOCl/carbon nitride oligomer heterostructures.

Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same author

LMOD+: A Comprehensive Multimodal Dataset and Benchmark for Developing and Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models in Ophthalmology.

ACM transactions on computing for healthcare·2026
Same authorSame journal

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026
Same author

Nothing to see here: The weak evidence base for unconscious control of human behavior.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Memorization in large language models in medicine prevalence characteristics and implications.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

The lifespan and healthspan extending effects of ellagic acid in <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i> require an intact insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway.

Frontiers in aging·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.7K

Good Learners Are Poor Monitors: A Negative Relation Between Learning Ability and Monitoring Accuracy.

Mengqi Hu1, Wenbo Zhao2, Anran Li1

  • 1Institute of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University.

Psychological Science
|August 22, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Effective learning requires monitoring accuracy. Surprisingly, superior learning ability correlates with poorer monitoring accuracy, challenging the notion that good learners are always good monitors.

Keywords:
expert underconfidencejudgments of learninglearning abilitymeta-analysismonitoring accuracy

More Related Videos

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.5K
Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
11:25

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 11, 2010

15.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.7K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.5K
Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
11:25

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 11, 2010

15.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Educational Psychology
  • Metacognition

Background:

  • Effective learning requires both knowledge acquisition and accurate self-monitoring.
  • The relationship between learning ability and the accuracy of monitoring one's learning (metacognitive accuracy) is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between an individual's learning ability and their accuracy in monitoring their learning progress.
  • To challenge the assumption that superior learners are inherently superior at monitoring their learning.

Main Methods:

  • A meta-analysis of existing data (N = 2,406) was conducted.
  • Reanalysis of meta-analysis data to examine underconfidence in expert learners.
  • Two controlled experiments (N = 102 and N = 481) were performed to conceptually replicate findings.

Main Results:

  • A counterintuitive negative association was found: individuals with higher learning ability showed slightly lower monitoring accuracy.
  • Expert learners demonstrated underconfidence, remembering more than they predicted they would.
  • Experimental studies confirmed the meta-analysis findings, indicating monitoring deficits in expert learners.

Conclusions:

  • The conventional wisdom that good learners are also good monitors is challenged.
  • Expert learners may possess monitoring deficits, specifically underconfidence in their memory predictions.
  • This suggests a potential dissociation between learning proficiency and metacognitive monitoring accuracy.