Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
Repair Versus Replacement in Mitral Valve Papillary Muscle Rupture: A Multicenter Study
Giulio Massimi1,2, Matteo Matteucci1,3, Michele De Bonis4
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, 6221, The Netherlands.
Objectives:
Papillary muscle rupture (PMR) is a rare but potentially fatal mechanical complication after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Although surgery is considered the gold-standard treatment for post-AMI PMR, the optimal surgical strategy remains unclear.
Methods:
Data from post-AMI PMR patients submitted to mitral valve replacement (MVR) or mitral valve repair (MVr) surgery in the period between 2001 and 2019, from 20 international centres, were collected in the CAUTION study database. In-hospital and long-term post-discharge mortality were the endpoints. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine mortality independent factors.
Results:
The patient cohort available included 218 patients. MVR was the most frequent type of surgery (81.6%). Complete PMR was more common in the MVR group (71.9%, P = .008), while partial PMR was more frequent in MVr patients (75%, P = .008). In-hospital mortality rate was 25.8% in the MVR subgroup and 20% in MVr subjects (P = .440). In MVR subgroup, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (n = 20/96, 21%) than no concomitant CABG (31.7%, P = .035). Survival at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 59.3%, 55.9%, 53.1%, 46.9% in the MVR group and 59.9%, 56.8%, 54.1%, and 43.2% in MVr patients, respectively, with no statistical differences (P = .474). Patients underwent MVr surgery, and 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival was 79.8%, 75.4%, 68.5%, and 37.5%, respectively, when CABG revascularization was performed, while no CABG survival was 16.7%, 16.7%, 8.3%, and 8.3% (P < .001).
Conclusions:
MVR is the most commonly performed in complete post-AMI PMR and MVr in partial PMR. No differences were observed regarding in-hospital and long-term mortality in the 2 surgical groups, and no independent factors were associated with overall mortality. Concomitant CABG was associated with higher in-hospital survival.
Clinical Registration Number:
Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03848429.
Insights
Surgery for papillary muscle rupture after myocardial infarction showed no significant difference in mortality between mitral valve repair and replacement. However, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting improved in-hospital survival.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery Outcomes
Background:
- Papillary muscle rupture (PMR) is a rare, life-threatening complication following acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
- Surgical intervention is the standard treatment, but optimal strategies remain debated.
- This study analyzes outcomes from the CAUTION study database.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of mitral valve repair (MVr) versus mitral valve replacement (MVR) for post-AMI PMR.
- To identify factors influencing in-hospital and long-term mortality.
- To evaluate the impact of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 218 patients undergoing MVR or MVr for post-AMI PMR (2001-2019) from 20 international centers.
- Comparison of in-hospital and long-term post-discharge mortality rates.
- Multivariable logistic regression to identify independent predictors of mortality.
Main Results:
- MVR was performed in 81.6% of cases, often for complete PMR, while MVr was more frequent in partial PMR.
- In-hospital mortality was 25.8% for MVR and 20% for MVr (p=0.440).
- Long-term survival showed no significant difference between MVR and MVr groups (p=0.474).
- Concomitant CABG was associated with lower in-hospital mortality in the MVR group (21% vs 31.7%, p=0.035).
- MVr with CABG demonstrated significantly higher long-term survival (p<0.001).
Conclusions:
- MVR is preferred for complete PMR, and MVr for partial PMR.
- No significant differences in in-hospital or long-term mortality were observed between MVR and MVr.
- Concomitant CABG is associated with improved in-hospital survival, particularly in the MVr group.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests

