Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.0K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.1K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.1K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.1K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.1K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.1K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
1.1K
Singularity Functions for Shear01:26

Singularity Functions for Shear

193
In structural analysis, singularity functions are crucial in simplifying the representation of shear forces in beams under discontinuous loading. These functions describe discontinuous  variations in shear force across a beam with varying loads by using a single mathematical expression, regardless of the complexity of the loading conditions. The singularity functions are derived from creating a free-body diagram of the beam and then making conceptual cuts at specific points to examine the...
193
Radicals: Electronic Structure and Geometry01:07

Radicals: Electronic Structure and Geometry

4.2K
This lesson delves into the geometry of a radical, which is influenced by the electronic structure of the molecule. The principle is similar to that of a lone pair, where the unpaired electron influences the geometry at the radical center.
Accordingly, the structure of a trivalent radical lies between the geometries of carbocations and carbanions. An sp2-hybridized carbocation is trigonal planar, while an sp3-hybridized carbanion is trigonal pyramidal. Here, the difference in geometry is...
4.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fusing LandTrendr BCI and machine learning for spoil dump mapping.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Surface hopping with nuclear quantum effects through path-integral coarse graining.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

Omics Insights Into the Effects of Highbush Blueberry and Cranberry Crop Agroecosystems on Honey Bee Health and Physiology.

Proteomics·2025
Same author

Beyond genomics: a multiomics future for parasitology.

Trends in parasitology·2025
Same author

Reactive molecular beam epitaxial growth of RuO<sub>2</sub>superconducting thin films.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2025
Same author

Large Band Splitting in g-Wave Altermagnet CrSb.

Physical review letters·2024
Same journal

Nuclear Gradients from Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo and Their Applications in ML-Driven Geometry Optimization and Transition State Search.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Cluster-in-Molecule Local Correlation Method with an Accurate Distant Pair Correction for Large Systems".

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Machine-Learned Force Fields for Lattice Dynamics at Coupled-Cluster Level Accuracy.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Systematic Molecularity-Dependent Entropy Errors in Continuum/RRHO Solution Thermochemistry: Origin and Correction.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

After 100 Years of Quantum Mechanics: Toward a Constructive Observation-Centered Perspective.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Sample-Based Quantum Diagonalization Methods for Modeling the Photochemistry of Diazirine and Diazo Compounds.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
11:44

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes

Published on: November 12, 2016

18.1K

Spin-Density Functional Regularization for Singlet Diradicals.

Yi Shi1, Yuming Shi2, Adam Wasserman3,4

  • 1State Key Laboratory for Artificial Microstructure and Mesoscopic Physics, Frontier Science Center for Nano-optoelectronics and School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|August 22, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new spin-density functional regularization (SR) approach corrects errors in broken-symmetry density functional theory (DFT) calculations for singlet diradicals. This method accurately predicts energy barriers for complex reactions, like cyclobutadiene automerization.

More Related Videos

Practical Aspects of Sample Preparation and Setup of 1H R1&#961; Relaxation Dispersion Experiments of RNA
08:17

Practical Aspects of Sample Preparation and Setup of 1H R1ρ Relaxation Dispersion Experiments of RNA

Published on: July 9, 2021

4.8K
Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
11:44

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes

Published on: November 12, 2016

18.1K
Practical Aspects of Sample Preparation and Setup of 1H R1&#961; Relaxation Dispersion Experiments of RNA
08:17

Practical Aspects of Sample Preparation and Setup of 1H R1ρ Relaxation Dispersion Experiments of RNA

Published on: July 9, 2021

4.8K
Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum Chemistry
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Theoretical Chemistry

Background:

  • Broken-symmetry density functional theory (DFT) is widely used for static correlation in singlet diradicals.
  • This method can fail for complex electronic structures due to artificial spin symmetry breaking.
  • Singlet diradicals arise from (quasi-)degenerate frontier orbitals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a method to correct errors from artificial symmetry breaking in broken-symmetry DFT.
  • To improve the accuracy of energy calculations for systems with complex electronic structures.

Main Methods:

  • Introduction of a spin-density functional regularization (SR) approach.
  • Integration of SR within the framework of partition density functional theory (PDFT).
  • Application to the automerization of cyclobutadiene, a system with a singlet diradical transition state.

Main Results:

  • The SR-PDFT approach effectively corrects errors caused by artificial symmetry breaking.
  • Conventional broken-symmetry DFT calculations underestimate the automerization transition state energy for cyclobutadiene.
  • SR-PDFT yields chemically accurate barrier heights for the cyclobutadiene automerization reaction.

Conclusions:

  • The SR-PDFT method provides a robust way to handle static correlation in singlet diradicals.
  • This approach overcomes limitations of conventional broken-symmetry DFT for complex systems.
  • Accurate prediction of reaction barrier heights is achieved, demonstrating the method's efficacy.