Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

09:50
Impact Assessment of Repeated Exposure of Organotypic 3D Bronchial and Nasal Tissue Culture Models to Whole Cigarette Smoke
Published on: February 12, 2015
11.3K
Reply to Zhou et al.: Methodological Pitfalls Undermine Industrial Emission-related Lung Cancer Risk Assessment
Jessica M Madrigal1, Jared A Fisher2, Caroline N Pruitt3
1National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, ROCKVILLE, Maryland, United States; jessica.madrigal@nih.gov.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
|August 22, 2025
Abstract
No abstract available in PubMed .
Related Concept Videos
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
1.4K
Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
1.4K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
635
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
635
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
521
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
521
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
675
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
675
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
532
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
532

