Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Massively parallel analysis of genotype-dependent enhancer activity among atopic dermatitis genetic risk variants
Molly S Shook1, Xiaoming Lu1, Xiaoting Chen1
1Center for Autoimmune Genomics and Etiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Background:
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory, pruritic disease of the skin with a complex etiology involving environmental and genetic factors. Numerous genetic risk loci for AD have been nominated through genome-wide association studies, with most associated variants residing in noncoding regions. Further work is needed to understand how genetic variation contributes to disease-related alterations to gene expression.
Objective:
We sought to use massively parallel reporter assays to identify genetic risk variants with genotype-dependent regulatory activity within a set of 2,381 variants distributed among 49 independent AD risk loci.
Methods:
We used our massively parallel reporter assay library in HaCaT skin keratinocytes, TE-7 esophageal epithelial cells, and Jurkat T cells, enabling the identification of shared and cell-type-specific variants with genotype-dependent enhancer activity. Stimulation of HaCaT and TE-7 cells with the cytokine IL-13 revealed 14 variants with stimulation-dependent allelic expression patterns.
Results:
Our approach discovered 96 allelic enhancer variants among all investigated cellular contexts, representing 32 independent AD risk loci. We discover a possible mechanistic role for activator protein 1 family transcription factors, as revealed by motif enrichment, genotype-dependent binding, and enhanced chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing signal at AD risk variants with allelic enhancer activity compared with variants with nonallelic enhancer activity. We assign allelic enhancer variants to probable target genes, including previously identified risk genes such as KIF3A and FLG.
Conclusions:
Our systematic, genome-scale approach implicates causal genotype-dependent gene regulatory mechanisms for most AD risk loci, providing a unique resource for the discovery of the genetic mechanisms underlying this disease.
More Related Videos
11:35Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
Published on: August 21, 2016
04:41Mapping Alzheimer's Disease Variants to Their Target Genes Using Computational Analysis of Chromatin Configuration
Published on: January 9, 2020