Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Key determinants in implementation processes: a systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation
Marin Schmitt1, Maren Hawkins2, Paul Florsheim3
1Zilber College of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 1240 N. 10th St., Milwaukee, WI, USA. marins@uwm.edu.
Background:
Contextual factors, or determinants, are commonly assessed in implementation studies due to their impact on the implementation process. While a substantial number of determinants have been identified, less research has examined the strength of their impact on the implementation process. Identification of key determinants, or those found to play the biggest role in the implementation process more frequently, may assist in guiding implementation of health programs and services. Damschroder & Lowery (2013) developed a rating system to assess which Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs have the strongest impact on implementation. The purpose of this article was to systematically review articles that have utilized this rating system in order to identify key determinants.
Methods:
We conducted forward citation searching of articles citing Damschroder & Lowery's (2013) rating criteria in three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) in February 2023. Included articles examined the magnitude and valence of factors affecting the implementation process. Quality appraisal was completed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Articles were included regardless of design, setting, location, or target population. A comprehensive examination of the determinants through numerous graphs and tables was conducted to identify key determinants.
Results:
Forty-eight articles were included in the final review. Eight key determinants were identified: Leadership Engagement, Formally Appointed Internal Implementation Leaders, Compatibility, Available Resources, External Change Agents, Champions, Relative Advantage, and Key Stakeholders.
Conclusions:
A more systematic approach to guiding implementation efforts will lead to the development of effective implementation strategies that could ultimately improve implementation outcomes. While quantifying qualitative data inherently removes some important nuance, by identifying key determinants, we hope to help researchers and practitioners identify which factors are likely to facilitate success of their implementation efforts.
Trial Registration:
The protocol for this systematic review was published with PROSPERO (CRD42023416340).
Related Concept Videos
01:15Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
01:25Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
01:24Factors Affecting Workability
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
00:52Social Proof
01:29Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions