Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Asthma Detection Research Based on Voice Signal Processing and Machine Learning
Published on: July 22, 2025
External Validation of a Multivariable Diagnostic Prediction Model for Acute Invasive Fungal Rhinosinusitis in
Aviv Spillinger1, Johanna Ellefson1, Qiuyu Yang2
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Background:
Prompt detection and intervention are crucial for improving outcomes in acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (AIFS). Diagnostic prediction models assist in risk-stratification, but their accuracy requires testing through external validation. This study aims to validate a previously published diagnostic prediction model for AIFS in an independent cohort.
Methods:
A retrospective chart review was conducted at a tertiary care center (2008-2023) to identify patients with an otolaryngology consult for suspected AIFS. Of 65 patients identified, 11 (16.9%) were diagnosed with AIFS based on histopathology. Risk was calculated using Yin et al.'s predictive model. Predictive performance was assessed by calibration and discrimination.
Results:
Patients had significantly higher rates of diabetes (46.2% vs. 26.1%, p = 0.002), long-term steroid use (60% vs. 28.2%, p < 0.0001), and solid organ transplantation (38.5% vs. 8.5%, p < 0.001), compared with the development cohort, with conversely lower rates of hematologic malignancy (29.2% vs. 58.7, p < 0.001) and neutropenia (19.4% vs. 41%, p = 0.001). Despite these differences, both the three-variable (C-index: 0.844; 95% CI, 0.736-0.952) and four-variable models (C-index: 0.963; 95% CI, 0.919-1) showed adequate discrimination. Both models exhibited slight overprediction of risk, with a calibration-in-the-large predicted risk of 24.1% (95% CI, 13.68-34.46) for the three-variable model and 24.2% (95% CI, 13.76-34.57) for the four-variable model. Calibration plots confirmed overprediction.
Conclusion:
The AIFS diagnostic model demonstrates acceptable discrimination and calibration on external validation, with generalizability to patients with different comorbidities. Larger studies are recommended to further test the model's predictive performance and clinical applicability.
Insights
This study validates a diagnostic model for acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (AIFS), showing it performs well in identifying patients with different risk factors. The model is generalizable and aids in timely AIFS detection.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Infectious Diseases
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Prompt detection and intervention are critical for improving outcomes in acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (AIFS).
- Diagnostic prediction models aid in risk-stratification but require external validation to confirm accuracy.
- This study validates a previously developed AIFS diagnostic model in an independent patient cohort.
Purpose of the Study:
- To externally validate a published diagnostic prediction model for acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (AIFS).
- To assess the model's performance in an independent cohort with potentially different comorbidities.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective chart review identified patients with suspected AIFS from 2008-2023.
- The Yin et al. predictive model was applied to calculate risk in 65 patients (11 diagnosed with AIFS).
- Model performance was evaluated using calibration and discrimination metrics.
Main Results:
- The validation cohort had higher rates of diabetes, steroid use, and organ transplantation, but lower rates of hematologic malignancy and neutropenia compared to the development cohort.
- Both three-variable (C-index: 0.844) and four-variable (C-index: 0.963) models demonstrated adequate discrimination.
- Models showed slight overprediction, with calibration-in-the-large risks of 24.1% and 24.2% respectively.
Conclusions:
- The AIFS diagnostic model shows acceptable discrimination and calibration upon external validation.
- The model is generalizable to patients with varying comorbidities.
- Larger studies are recommended to further confirm predictive performance and clinical utility.
Related Concept Videos
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

