Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiovascular Imaging - Introducing the Spatially Weighted Calcium Score for Early Disease Detection
Published on: September 22, 2023
Deep learning ensemble for abdominal aortic calcification scoring from lumbar spine X-ray and DXA images
Antti Voss1, Sanna Suoranta2, Tomi Nissinen1
1Kuopio University Hospital, Department of Clinical Radiology, Wellbeing Services County of North Savo, Finland; University of Easter Finland, Department of Technical Physics, Kuopio, Finland.
None:
Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is an independent predictor of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). AAC is typically detected as an incidental finding in spine scans. Early detection of AAC through opportunistic screening using any available imaging modalities could help identify individuals with a higher risk of developing clinical CVDs. However, AAC is not routinely assessed in clinics, and manual scoring from projection images is time-consuming and prone to inter-rater variability. Also, automated AAC scoring methods exist, but earlier methods have not accounted for the inherent variability in AAC scoring and were developed for a single imaging modality at a time. We propose an automated method for quantifying AAC from lumbar spine X-ray and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) images using an ensemble of convolutional neural network models that predicts a distribution of probable AAC scores. We treat AAC score as a normally distributed random variable to account for the variability of manual scoring. The mean and variance of the assumed normal AAC distributions are estimated based on manual annotations, and the models in the ensemble are trained by simulating AAC scores from these distributions. Our proposed ensemble approach successfully extracted AAC scores from both X-ray and DXA images with predicted score distributions demonstrating strong agreement with manual annotations, as evidenced by concordance correlation coefficients of 0.930 for X-ray and 0.912 for DXA. The prediction error between the average estimates of our approach and the average manual annotations was lower than the errors reported previously, highlighting the benefit of incorporating uncertainty in AAC scoring.
More Related Videos
07:15Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
Published on: August 16, 2020
09:32Time-Resolved, Dynamic Computed Tomography Angiography for Characterization of Aortic Endoleaks and Treatment Guidance via 2D-3D Fusion-Imaging
Published on: December 9, 2021