Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees
Published on: July 15, 2009
Multi-electrode catheter PFA: Computational modeling and in vivo validation of lesion dynamics under energy-dose
Xingkai Ji1, Kaihao Gu1, Hairui Wang1
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Background And Objective:
As a non-thermal ablation modality, pulsed field ablation (PFA) has been widely applied in solid tumor treatment and cardiac ablation. Multiple factors are known to influence the effects of PFA, including pulse parameters, catheter configurations, and tissue properties. However, limited attention has been paid to the impact of discharge modes on PFA.
Methods:
A sequential discharge mode (M2) was designed based on a multi-electrode ablation catheter and compared with the conventional simultaneous discharge mode (M1). To evaluate the ablation efficacy of different modes, three-dimensional ablation models incorporating two multi-electrode catheter configurations (circular and linear) were established. A comparative numerical simulation analysis was conducted to investigate the electric potential and field distribution characteristics of M1 and M2, followed by animal experiments to validate the simulation results. The comprehensive performance of the two discharge modes was assessed in terms of ablation efficacy and muscle contraction.
Results:
M2 demonstrated superior ablation efficacy over M1 in both catheter configurations. For the circular catheter, the minimum lesion depth (M1: 2.08 ± 0.10 mm vs. M2: 2.64 ± 0.46 mm, p = 0.006) was significantly improved, and the uniformity of lesion depth (M1: 0.18 vs. M2: 0.16) was partially enhanced. Similarly, the linear catheter showed improved the minimum lesion depth (M1: 2.81 ± 0.21 mm vs. M2: 3.41 ± 0.44 mm, p = 0.001) and the uniformity of lesion depth (M1: 0.13 vs. M2: 0.11). This advantage may be attributed to M2's higher pulsed energy output and optimized ablation strategy. Notably, although M2 induced slightly higher muscle contraction amplitudes than M1, both modes maintained low contraction levels without significantly compromising ablation efficacy. Specifically, peak accelerations were recorded as M1: 0.030 ± 0.028 g vs. M2: 0.039 ± 0.016 g (p = 0.369) for the circular catheter and M1: 0.031 ± 0.017 g vs. M2: 0.040 ± 0.016 g (p = 0.242) for the linear catheter.
Conclusion:
Compared to the conventional discharge mode, the sequential discharge mode is recognized as a superior ablation strategy, achieving enhancements in lesion dimensions and uniformity while maintaining a controlled safety profile.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient
The activity coefficient value for an ion is close to one when the solution has almost zero ionic strength, i.e., when the solution shows close to ideal behavior. As the ionic strength of the solution increases from 0 to 0.1 mol/L, a decrease in the...
One-Compartment Open Model: Urinary Excretion Data and Determination of k
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This relationship...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model
When a drug is administered through a constant intravenous infusion and eliminated via nonlinear pharmacokinetics, it follows zero-order input. For example, oral drugs undergo first-order absorption upon administration and are eliminated through nonlinear pharmacokinetics.
In the case of subcutaneously administered drugs,...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

