Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos
Published on: March 21, 2021
Prevalence and Prognostic Differences Between Sarcopenia and Sarcopenic Obesity in Heart Failure
Yule Hu1, Yan Li2, Huiying Ma3
1School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China; School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
None:
Evidence directly comparing sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in hospitalized heart failure (HF) patients, especially in young and middle-aged individuals, remains limited. This study aimed to (1) investigate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity, and (2) compare their prognostic impacts on adverse outcomes to identify protective body composition phenotypes. The findings are hypothesized to provide new perspectives on the HF obesity paradox. This prospective cohort study was conducted from June 2022 to October 2023. The primary endpoint was 1-year HF-related readmission or all-cause mortality. Prolonged hospital stays and 90-day HF-related readmission or all-cause mortality were set as secondary outcomes. Associations of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity with poor clinical outcomes were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression. Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity prevalence were 26.4% (n = 57) and 19.4% (n = 42) among 216 participants, with malnutrition present in 77.2% (44/57) and 71.4% (30/42) of cases, respectively. After adjusting for covariates, both sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity independently predicted 1-year HF-related readmission or all-cause mortality (sarcopenia vs nonsarcopenia: HR = 2.048 [95% CI:1.064∼3.940], p = 0.032; sarcopenic obesity vs nonsarcopenic obesity: HR = 1.932 [95% CI:1.062∼3.515], p = 0.031). Sarcopenic obesity also independently predicted the prolonged hospital stay (OR = 2.418 [95% CI:1.050∼5.567], p = 0.038). In conclusion, hospitalized HF patients were susceptible to sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, and the double burden of malnutrition and obesity. Muscle mass, rather than fat mass, may exert protective effects, which could partially explain the HF obesity paradox. Interventions aimed at reducing obesity while ensuring the maintenance of, or an increase in, muscle mass should be developed.
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions

