Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
Published on: April 6, 2018
Children Demand an Equal Share of Worthless Objects
Colin Jacobs1, Sebastian Grueneisen2, Harriet Over3
1University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Insights
Young children reject unfair treatment even when the unequal items are undesirable. This costly rejection of inequity suggests interpersonal concerns, not just material gain, drive fairness development in children.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
- Social Neuroscience
Background:
- Fairness development involves disadvantageous inequity aversion, where individuals sacrifice rewards to avoid unequal outcomes.
- The equal respect hypothesis posits that children's fairness decisions are influenced by interpersonal concerns, not solely material considerations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether young children reject disadvantageous inequity when the unequal items are undesirable.
- To determine if interpersonal factors, such as the distributor's reasoning, influence children's rejection of inequity.
Main Methods:
- Three pre-registered experiments were conducted with 184 children aged 4-7 years.
- Children's responses to unequal offers of undesirable objects were analyzed.
- The impact of providing a reason for unequal distribution on children's rejection behavior was examined.
Main Results:
- Children as young as 4 years old demonstrated aversion to unequal distributions of undesirable objects.
- Children were willing to sacrifice high-value rewards to reject inequity involving undesirable objects.
- The likelihood of refusing unequal offers of undesirable objects decreased when a reason for the disparity was provided.
Conclusions:
- Interpersonal concerns significantly motivate the costly rejection of inequity, even when material consequences are negligible.
- Children's fairness judgments are influenced by social and relational factors beyond simple material gain.
- The findings support the equal respect hypothesis by highlighting the role of social motivations in early fairness development.
Abstract:
A key milestone in the development of fairness is disadvantageous inequity aversion: a willingness to sacrifice valuable rewards to avoid receiving less than a peer. The equal respect hypothesis suggests that, in addition to material concerns, children are also motivated to reject disadvantageous inequity due to interpersonal concerns. To test this prediction, we investigated how young children (N = 184, ages 4-7) respond to receiving less of the objects they explicitly do not desire across three pre-registered experiments. We found that, from 4 years old, children are averse to receiving unequal offers of undesirable objects (Experiment 1) and are even willing to sacrifice a high-value reward to reject inequality of undesirable objects (Experiment 2). Children are less likely to refuse unequal offers of undesirable objects when the distributor provides a reason for giving them less (Experiment 3). Together, these studies demonstrate that interpersonal concerns play a key role in motivating the costly rejection of inequity. SUMMARY: 4-7-year-olds reject unequal allocations of worthless objects despite not liking them (Experiment 1). Children even sacrifice a high-value reward to reject unequal allocations of worthless objects (Experiment 2). Children reject unequal allocations less often when given a reason for the unequal distribution by the distributor (Experiment 3). This suggests that interpersonal concerns play a key role in motivating the costly rejection of inequity, independent of material consequences.
Related Concept Videos
Group Design
Distribution and Dispersion
Probability Distributions
A discrete probability distribution is a probability distribution of discrete random variables. It can be categorized into binomial probability distribution and Poisson...
Bullying
Uniform Distribution
Two essential properties of this distribution are
Deindividuation

