Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

39.6K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
39.6K
Altruism01:03

Altruism

41.6K
Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
41.6K
Obedience01:08

Obedience

33.1K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
33.1K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

24.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
24.0K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.4K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.4K
Punishment01:27

Punishment

326
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
326

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Children's Third-Party Punishment Reveals a Genuine Concern for Fairness and Justice.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same author

Trusting Wisely? Developmental Changes in How Children Learn and Adapt to Partner Trustworthiness.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Collaborative Dishonesty: Children Are More Likely to Cheat When They Benefit Together.

Developmental science·2025
Same author

Across six societies children engage in costly third-party punishment of unfair sharing.

Communications psychology·2025
Same author

Young children's adaptive partner choice in cooperation and competition contexts.

Child development·2023
Same author

How fairness and dominance guide young children's bargaining decisions.

Child development·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.5K

Children Cheat to Return a Favor.

Laura Tietz1, Felix Warneken2, Sebastian Grueneisen1

  • 1Faculty of Education, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Developmental Science
|August 24, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Children aged 5-8 years understand honesty but will cheat to return a favor, showing early moral conflict. Reciprocity can override honesty norms in young children, influencing their decision-making.

Keywords:
cheatingdishonestyinterpersonal obligationsreciprocitysocial cognition

More Related Videos

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.6K
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children
07:01

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children

Published on: March 1, 2019

8.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.5K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.6K
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children
07:01

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children

Published on: March 1, 2019

8.0K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Moral Development
  • Social Cognition

Background:

  • Reciprocity is crucial for human cooperation, involving mutual benefit despite personal cost.
  • A conflict exists between reciprocity and honesty norms, posing moral dilemmas.
  • Previous research on reciprocity in children primarily focused on prosocial aspects, neglecting honesty conflicts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the developmental origins of the conflict between reciprocity and honesty in children.
  • To examine 5- to 8-year-old children's evaluations of and engagement in prosocial cheating to return favors.

Main Methods:

  • Study 1: Children evaluated hypothetical scenarios of protagonists cheating to benefit others, with or without owing a favor.
  • Study 2: Children participated in games where they could cheat to benefit a partner who had previously shared a resource or not.

Main Results:

  • From a third-party perspective, children condemned cheating and prioritized honesty over reciprocity.
  • When acting themselves, children were more likely to cheat to benefit a partner if they owed them a favor.
  • Findings indicate children as young as 5 are willing to disregard honesty to reciprocate prosocial acts.

Conclusions:

  • Reciprocity can override honesty norms in early childhood, demonstrating the developmental roots of this moral tension.
  • Children's moral decision-making is shaped by the interplay between interpersonal obligations and societal norms.
  • This research highlights a critical developmental stage in understanding complex moral trade-offs.