Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Capturing the Cardiac Injury Response of Targeted Cell Populations via Cleared Heart Three-Dimensional Imaging
Published on: March 17, 2020
Caregiver experience of at-home softcast removal following paediatric trauma
Jingjing Wang1, Katie Patterson Hughes2, Joanna Marilyn Stewart Aithie2
1The University of Edinburgh Medical School, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, United Kingdom.
Insights
At-home softcast removal for pediatric fractures is safe and feasible, even for displaced injuries. Most families reported positive experiences, and this practice reduced clinic visits by over 50%.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Orthopedics
- Fracture Management
- Healthcare Service Delivery
Background:
- Circumferential softcasts are used for pediatric fractures requiring manipulation.
- Traditional follow-up protocols involve routine clinic appointments.
- Alternative models for cast removal are being explored to improve efficiency and patient experience.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety and feasibility of at-home softcast removal in children with displaced fractures.
- To understand the caregiver experience associated with at-home cast removal.
- To evaluate the impact of this practice on healthcare service utilization at a tertiary center.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of pediatric patients (<16 years) undergoing at-home softcast removal without planned follow-up.
- Data collected included demographics, fracture characteristics, manipulation details, and re-attendance rates.
- Caregiver satisfaction and experience were assessed via telephone questionnaire; cost analysis was performed.
Main Results:
- 77 caregivers completed the survey; mean patient age was 7.6 years.
- 52% of injuries underwent manipulation; 16.9% of patients re-attended with cast issues.
- 83.1% of caregivers found removal easy, 75.3% were satisfied, and 71.4% would recommend it; >50% reduction in clinic attendances and £22,600 annual savings.
Conclusions:
- At-home softcast removal is a safe and feasible option for pediatric fractures, including displaced injuries.
- The majority of families reported positive experiences, though patient education is crucial for universal success.
- This approach significantly reduces healthcare service demand and associated costs.
Aims:
This study aimed to explore safety and feasibility of at-home softcast removal in children with displaced injuries undergoing manipulation; understand caregiver experience; and determine its impact on service at our tertiary centre.
Methods:
Paediatric patients (<16 years) with any fracture requiring application of a circumferential softcast, later removed at home without planned routine follow-up, were retrospectively analysed from two time-points: July-September 2022; February-April 2023. Demographic data including age, fracture location, angulation, whether manipulation was undertaken, and unplanned re-attendances were recorded. Caregivers completed a telephone Likert questionnaire (1=extremely positive, 5=extremely negative) reviewing cast removal time and qualitative descriptors of experience. Cost analysis was performed based on use of consumables, staff and clinical areas.
Results:
77 caregivers completed the questionnaire at mean 93.4 days post-injury. Mean patient age was 7.6 years at time of injury. 41 (53.2 %) were distal radius, 20 (26.0 %) forearm and 16 (20.8 %) were elbow, hand or tibia fractures. Mean sagittal angulation was 24.7 degrees and 40 (52.0 %) injuries underwent manipulation under sedation. 13 (16.9 %) patients re-attended with cast problems. Caregivers estimated a mean 13.3 min to remove the cast. 83.1 % found it 'extremely' or 'somewhat' easy. 75.3 % were 'extremely' or 'somewhat' satisfied. 71.4 % were 'extremely' or 'somewhat' likely to recommend it. Qualitative descriptors ranged from "traumatic" to "easy". Since introduction of this practice, subsequent clinic attendances for children diagnosed with a fracture in the Emergency Department has reduced by >50 %, equating to savings of approximately £22,600 per annum.
Conclusion:
Our experience confirms at-home softcast removal without further orthopaedic follow-up is safe and feasible, even in displaced injuries undergoing manipulation. The majority of families reported positive experiences. However, this was not universal and adequate patient education was integral to this.
Related Concept Videos
Restorative Care
Tracheostomy Care II: Procedure
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene, and put on personal protective equipment: gown, gloves, mask...
Clinical Applications of Epidermal Stem Cells
Endoscopic Studies II: Thoracocentesis
Description
Excess pleural fluid or air may accumulate in some respiratory disorders in the thoracic cavity. To treat pleural effusion, a physician conducts thoracentesis by carefully piercing the chest wall and entering...
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:

