Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
Enhancing the usability of the 2023 beers criteria: A structured framework for geriatric prescribing safety
Ying-Mei Wang1, Pei-Chen Lee2, Hung-Wei Shen3
1Department of Medical Education and Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC; No. 81, Sec. 1, Zhongfeng Rd., Zhudong Township, Hsinchu County 310, Taiwan, ROC; Department of Pharmacy, Taipei Veterans General Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC; No. 81, Sec. 1, Zhongfeng Rd., Zhudong Township, Hsinchu County 310, ROC, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC; No. 101, Sec. 2, Kuang-Fu Rd., Hsinchu City 300, ROC, Taiwan.
Background:
The American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Beers Criteria is one of the most widely used tools for identifying potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older adults worldwide. However, its narrative format, ambiguous definitions, and lack of machine readability hinder integration with electronic health records (EHRs), clinical decision support systems, and real-world data analysis. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a structured, programmable, and multidimensional evaluation framework to transform the 2023 AGS Beers Criteria into computable logic components, thereby supporting automated PIM identification and clinical application.
Methods:
We systematically reviewed 87 PIM-related statements from Tables 2-6 of the 2023 AGS Beers Criteria. A multidisciplinary team deconstructed each criterion into structured logical components and categorized them into the following five main domains: within-prescription, outside-prescription, recommendation/strength, key issues, and interpretative information. Twenty-four subcategories were identified, including dose, route, laboratory data, co-medications, grouping issues, and ambiguous expressions.
Results:
Only 8.0% of the 2023 AGS Beers Criteria could be evaluated using drug names alone, while 92.0% required multi-factorial analysis. We identified 404 computable elements: 30.2% could be assessed using prescription-only data, 25.2% required external data such as diagnoses or laboratory data, and 44.6% involved interpretive or structural complexity.
Conclusion:
This novel framework addresses key barriers to the programmatic implementation of the 2023 AGS Beers Criteria. It enables artificial intelligence-supported PIM identification, facilitates EHR integration, and establishes a scalable infrastructure for geriatric pharmacovigilance, ultimately improving medication safety for older adults.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Cognitive Enhancers: Cholinesterase Inhibitors and NMDA Receptor Antagonists
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Standards of Care II
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...

