Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

An Aptamer-based Sensor for Unchelated GadoliniumIII
Published on: January 9, 2017
Distribution and ecological risk of iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast agents in an impacted basin of central
Jaime Dueñas-Moreno1, Abrahan Mora1, Cristina Moreau1
1Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey, N.L., 64700, Mexico.
Abstract:
Iodinated X-ray contrast media (ICM) and Gadolinium-based contrast agents (Gd-CAs) are extensively used in medical imaging and are excreted unchanged by patients. However, conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are ineffective at removing these compounds, leading to their discharge into surface waters, where they persist due to their recalcitrant nature. Although the presence of both groups of contrast agents in the aquatic environment has been documented, data on their co-occurrence, distribution, and ecological risk in freshwater systems remain scarce. This study addresses this knowledge gap by providing the first comprehensive assessment of the co-occurrence, spatial distribution, and ecological risks of ICM, specifically amidotrizoic acid (DIA), iomeprol (IOM), iopamidol (IOD), and iopromide (IOP), as well as anthropogenic Gd (Gdanth, encompassing all Gd-CAs), in the surface waters of the Atoyac River basin in Mexico. Concentrations of these contaminants ranged from 6.38 ng L-1 for Gdanth to 3700 ng L-1 for IOP, with the highest levels measured near the WWTP discharge sites and areas with a high density of medical facilities. Elevated concentrations were also observed in river sections with fewer upstream medical facilities, suggesting additional sources or transport mechanisms. In the reservoir, the concentrations of IOD and IOP were high across nine sites, ranging from 261.10 ± 61.20 ng L-1 to 412.20 ± 48.50 ng L-1. This finding highlights their persistence and resistance to biodegradation in aquatic environments. Interestingly, while ICM and Gd-CAs are released into the river from medical facilities, they did not co-occur in the river waters, indicating distinct environmental behavior and/or sources. Finally, deterministic ecological risk assessments revealed that contrast agents posed no ecological risk to aquatic species. This study is the first to document the co-contamination of ICM and Gd-CAs in river waters and to evaluate their associated ecological risks, providing critical insights into the environmental presence of these medical imaging agents.
More Related Videos
08:13In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
13:21Preparation, Purification, and Characterization of Lanthanide Complexes for Use as Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: July 21, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Drug Distribution: Tissue Binding
For...