Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

A Telemetric, Gravimetric Platform for Real-Time Physiological Phenotyping of Plant–Environment Interactions
Published on: August 5, 2020
Enhancing the prediction accuracy of groundnut yield by integrating significant markers and modeling genotype ×
Nelson Lubanga1, Velma Okaron2, Davis M Gimode3
1Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK.
Abstract:
Multi-environment trials are routinely conducted in plant breeding to capture the genotype-by-environment interaction (G × E) effects. Significant G × E could alter the response pattern of genotypes (the change in rankings of genotypes), subsequently complicating the selection process. Four genomic prediction (GP) models were assessed in three groundnut yield-related traits: pod yield (PY), seed weight (SW), and 100 seed weight (SW100), across four environments. The models, M1 (environment + line), M2 (environment + line + genomic), M3 (environment + line + genomic + genomic × environment interaction), and M4 (environment + line + genomic + genomic × environment interaction + significant markers), were tested using four cross-validation (CV) schemes (CV2, CV1, CV0, and CV00), each simulating different practical breeding scenarios. The results revealed that models incorporating marker data (M2, M3, and M4) consistently improved predictive ability in comparison to the phenotypic model (M1). Incorporating G × E (M3 and M4) further improved predictive ability and reduced residual and environmental variances. The inclusion of significant markers and G × E was more advantageous in CV1 and CV00 scenarios, demonstrating that this strategy is especially useful when phenotypic data for the target genotypes is limited or unavailable. Across the CV schemes, predictive ability was higher in CV2, suggesting that including additional information on the performance of genotypes in known environments can increase the accuracy of selecting superior genotypes in breeding programs. Integrating significant markers and modeling G × E in GP models could be an effective approach in groundnut breeding programs to accelerate genetic gains.
Related Concept Videos
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Monohybrid Crosses
Multiple Regression
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
Trihybrid Crosses
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal...
Light Acquisition
Dihybrid Crosses

