Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images
Published on: April 13, 2013
Hybrid Radiomics and Machine Learning for Brain Tumors Multi-Task Classification: An Exploratory Study on Integrating
Mostafa Jafari1, Masoumeh Rahmani2, Sanaz Alibabaie3
1Department of Radiologic Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences Ahvaz Iran.
Background And Aims:
Accurate classification of brain tumors is vital for effective treatment planning. Manual assessment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans is often subjective and time-consuming. This exploratory study proposes a machine learning approach integrating radiomic features from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI scans to improve classification accuracy for glioblastomas (GBM), meningiomas, brain metastases, and normal controls (NC).
Methods:
A total of 154 patients (74 GBM, 62 meningioma, 18 brain metastases) and 170 NCs were included in the study. MRI scans underwent standard preprocessing. To address class imbalance, data augmentation was applied to the GBM, meningioma, and brain metastases groups, increasing their sample sizes to 148, 124, and 180 cases, respectively. Radiomic features were extracted using gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) analysis and Curvelet-based transformations. Feature selection was performed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), followed by multicollinearity assessment using the Spearman correlation test. Principal component analysis (PCA) was also performed. Nine machine learning classifiers, including Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Naive Bayes, AdaBoost, and LightGBM, were trained and evaluated.
Results:
Random Forest and CatBoost achieved the highest performance, with 95.2% accuracy using LASSO-selected features, outperforming other classifiers. Combining GLCM and Curvelet features improved accuracy over either set alone. PCA-based dimensionality reduction (99% variance) also performed well, but slightly below LASSO.
Conclusion:
Integrating Curvelet and GLCM-based radiomics with optimized models improves diagnostic accuracy, offering a promising tool to assist radiologists in tumor classification.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
10:25Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
Published on: September 25, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...