Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

09:01
Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
11.9K
Mechanical Axis Deviation Angle Versus Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Correlation and Reliability
Vikram A Mhaskar1,2,3, Rachit Saggar4, Jitendra Maheshwari1,2
1JMVM Sports Injury Centre, Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, Qutub Institutional Area, New Delhi, India.
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
|August 25, 2025
Summary
The Mechanical Axis Deviation Angle (MAD-A) strongly correlates with the Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MAD-A offers superior inter-observer reliability for assessing coronal alignment.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomechanical Engineering
- Radiology
Background:
- Accurate assessment of coronal alignment is crucial in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for optimal functional outcomes.
- Traditional alignment metrics like the Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA) are widely used but can have limitations in reliability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the relationship between the Mechanical Axis Deviation Angle (MAD-A) and the Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA) in TKA patients.
- To compare the inter-observer reliability of MAD-A and HKA measurements for assessing coronal alignment.
Main Methods:
- MAD-A and HKA were measured preoperatively and postoperatively (6 weeks) using long-leg radiographs and CT scanograms in 108 knees undergoing primary TKA.
- MAD-A quantifies the angular deviation of the femoral mechanical axis from the ideal limb mechanical axis.
- Three independent observers performed measurements to assess inter-observer reliability.
Main Results:
- MAD-A measurements were consistently lower than HKA values (mean differences -1.4° to -6.2°).
- Both MAD-A and HKA showed strong positive correlations (r > 0.97, p < 0.001) at all time points.
- MAD-A demonstrated superior inter-observer reliability (ICC > 0.99) compared to HKA (ICC 0.966-0.988).
- Both HKA and MAD-A showed significant improvement post-TKA (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- MAD-A is strongly correlated with HKA and exhibits superior inter-observer reliability in TKA coronal alignment assessment.
- MAD-A may serve as a valuable complementary tool to HKA for alignment evaluation.
- Further research is warranted to establish normative MAD-A values across various knee pathologies.

