Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Cost-effectiveness of insulin icodec for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Canada
David A Garcia1, Godfrey Mau2, Sumeet Singh1
1CRG Eversana Canada Inc, Burlington, Canada.
Aim:
Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with poor glycemic control despite use of non-insulin agents can experience delay in initiating insulin therapy and poor adherence to insulin therapy, predominantly due to the burden of multiple injections1-3. This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of insulin icodec, first once-weekly basal insulin, compared with long-acting basal insulins for improving glycemic control in adults with T2D in Canada.
Materials And Methods:
The Swedish Institute of Health Economics T2D Cohort Model was used to analyse three T2D groups: insulin naïve (IN), basal insulin experienced (BIE), and basal-bolus insulin experienced (BBIE). Comparators included insulin glargine, insulin detemir, and insulin degludec. Comparative efficacy was informed by the phase 3 ONWARDS trials of insulin icodec and network meta-analyses (NMA). Time horizon was 40 years. Analyses considered disutilities resulting from vascular complications, age, gender, diabetes duration, hypoglycemia, and injection burden. A 1.5% annual discount rate was used for costs and effects. The average cost per unit for each treatment, accounting for the market share of available formats and biosimilars was calculated. Outcomes were expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost-effectiveness as incremental cost utility ratios (ICUR [cost/QALY]).
Results:
In all analyses, insulin icodec dominated insulin degludec and insulin detemir. Compared to insulin glargine U100 and U300, insulin icodec was associated with ICURs of $17,876, $20,844, and $73,253; and $6,439, $8,623, and $45,433 in the IN, BIE, and BBIE populations, respectively.
Limitations:
Limitations of this economic evaluation include the lack of data for some treatments in certain NMAs, uncertainty regarding the use of the NMA results for a 40-year time horizon, heterogeneous sources of disutilities, and uncertainty regarding the HRQoL benefits of reduced injection frequency.
Conclusions:
Insulin icodec is a cost-effective treatment option for adult patients with T2D versus once daily basal insulin-analogues publicly reimbursed in Canada.
Related Concept Videos
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Insulin Formulations: Types and Delivery
Short-acting insulins are divided into...
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications

