Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

15:25
Protocol for Dengue Infections in Mosquitoes A. aegypti and Infection Phenotype Determination
Published on: July 4, 2007
18.6K
RANDOMIZATION INFERENCE FOR CLUSTER-RANDOMIZED TEST-NEGATIVE DESIGNS WITH APPLICATION TO DENGUE STUDIES: UNBIASED
Bingkai Wang1, Suzanne M Dufault2, Dylan S Small1
1Department of Statistics and Data Science, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
The Annals of Applied Statistics
|August 26, 2025
Summary
The cluster-randomized test-negative design (CR-TND) offers cost-efficient dengue surveillance. New methods are proposed to correct bias in CR-TND when healthcare-seeking behavior varies, improving dengue control strategies.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics
- Infectious Disease Control
Background:
- Dengue is a major global health threat identified by the WHO.
- The Applying Wolbachia to Eliminate Dengue (AWED) study used a novel cluster-randomized test-negative design (CR-TND) for dengue control.
- CR-TND offers cost-efficiency through passive surveillance compared to traditional cluster-randomized trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the statistical assumptions and properties of CR-TND under a robust randomization inference framework.
- To address potential biases and inflated type I errors in CR-TND analysis when healthcare-seeking behavior differs across clusters.
- To propose and validate a novel statistical method for accurate inference in CR-TND.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of CR-TND using a randomization inference framework.
- Development and application of a log-contrast estimator to adjust for covariates and varying healthcare-seeking behavior.
- Extension of methods to accommodate partial intervention compliance and stepped-wedge designs.
- Validation through simulation studies and reanalysis of the AWED study data.
Main Results:
- Identified bias and inflated type I error in current CR-TND analysis methods when differential healthcare-seeking behavior varies across clusters.
- The proposed log-contrast estimator effectively eliminates bias and improves precision.
- The extended methods successfully handle partial compliance and stepped-wedge designs.
Conclusions:
- The proposed log-contrast estimator enhances the validity and reliability of CR-TND for dengue surveillance.
- The developed statistical framework provides robust inference for complex cluster-randomized trial designs.
- These advancements contribute to more effective and cost-efficient strategies for controlling dengue and similar infectious diseases.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
7.2K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.2K
Group Design
9.6K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.6K
McNemar's Test
415
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
415
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II
316
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and...
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and...
316
Introduction to Test of Independence
2.4K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.4K
The Anderson-Darling Test
873
The Anderson-Darling test is a statistical method used to determine whether a data sample is likely drawn from a specific theoretical distribution. Unlike parametric tests, it does not require assumptions about specific parameters of the distribution. Instead, it compares the sample's empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) with the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the hypothesized distribution. Critical values for the test are specific to the chosen distribution rather...
873

